Why? I don't understand when you have a good story to begin with, why do you have to change it so it's unrecognizable? So, where do I start?
1.the whole premise of the games is Nathan Drake going after DRAKE'S treasure NOT Magellan's.
2. Sam didn't give Nate the necklace, Nate stole it from a museum where he met Sullivan as a boy. (Uncharted 3 flashback)
3. Sam supposedly died in a prison break WITH Nate, not "killed" with Sullivan. (Uncharted 4)
4. Where is all the gunplay and explosions? THAT and the puzzle solving is the video game.
5. What the is it with co-mingling the various games? (even the closing credits shows someone trying to buy Drake's ring (Uncharted 3), asking about a Nazi submarine in the jungle (Uncharted 1) and what I'm assuming is Sam in prison (Uncharted 4)
6. Where the hell is Elena? I mean, she only became his WIFE.
I could only envision how much better this movie would have been following the first Uncharted. Nate and Elena about to open Sir Francis Drakes coffin. Finding the diary and then all hell breaks loose with the charted ship being attacked and Sully making a grand entrance in his plane. Now THAT would have been something. But, no. Some butthead had to skewer the plot and make this unrecognizable from the video games. Why bother calling it Uncharted? As a stand alone treasure hunting movie, it was Ok. Nothing spectacular, but OK, hence my 5 star review. As an adaptation of the video game, it was a 0.