Clever & funny (Spoilers included, from where it's indicated in text)
We went to see "Simone" (or, sorry, S1m0ne - that's lame, though) tonight, that was a funny, clever movie. I liked the way it was wittily perfected in all kinds of bigger or smaller details. From how, to name two random examples, in the scene where the madman genius with one sick, bandaged eye harasses the despairing director, you see somebody carrying a stage prop all the way in the background: a picture of an eye - to where, in the scene in which the cast of his new film is introduced, virtually, to the lead actress they still believe to be real, and their names are: Dell, Lotus ... "Hi, I'm Hal". That made me smile. Also, how it is so very clever in every detail, yet does not hesitate to go all overboard into the absurd, either - 'live, from her charity tour in the third world' ;-). You can sense they had fun doing that.
Yeh, it was a very clever film, almost too clever: a worthy successor to The Truman Show, enjoyable and just enough out and above the ordinary to pleasantly surprise you for a Hollywood flick, even if it's all a bit insubstantial in the end, and you have to wonder how much of it you'll remember later. And of course, there were a few too many loose ends and incongruous details, too (like -- stop reading here if you're still going to see it -- how we're supposed to believe that the director, the genius who constructed a whole parallel reality so well that a millions-strong audience believes in it, would just ship his disks in a trunk and throw it in the ocean, when I'm already going - but dude, now you can never prove anymore she was fake! - and then the story continues, and hey, he can't prove anymore she's fake - that was lame - and the whole old-style big floppy disk saying "Plague" thing, the effect of which apparently could be overturned by what looked like homegirl pressing enter repeatedly - I mean, really - you ever had a blue screen? That never works for me ... not even when I've only lost the text of a draft film review I hadn't saved ! ;)
It proved me wrong on one count, though, and that always makes me smile, if a mainstream movie does that. Cause like, when 'Simone' first appears in the movie, I was all, well, nice idea - but the whole thing, about the raving reviews and the fainting fans, is just not credible, because she is not actually beautiful, at all, and she looks in fact *very* artificial! But then the story kept unfolding, and the way it satirises how the media and the fans and the business all fall for the illusion, because they *want* to believe in it - "it's easier to fool a hundred thousand people than to fool one" - becomes more convincing, and then you realise - it doesn't matter a iota whether 'Simone' actually looks real or beautiful or not (in fact, the actress playing her must actually have been made to look artificial) - if they all believe it to be so, collectively will it to be so, it is so - that's the whole point, no?
7,5/10