RuiBilhardas

Netflix's "Break Point" series has undeniably stirred the pot in the realm of sports documentaries, but perhaps not in the way tennis purists hoped. Positioned as an intimate look into the professional tennis circuit, the series instead veers off into a narrative that feels more like a promotional vehicle for certain players at the twilight of their careers or those not meeting expectations. This approach transforms what could have been a profound exploration of tennis into a drama-heavy spectacle, sidelining the sport's essence for personal stories and conflicts.

The series chooses to spotlight a select group of players, weaving their stories into a narrative that sometimes feels more contrived than authentic. Episodes dedicated extensively to players like Foe and Coco, or focusing on the grievances between Zverev and Medvedev, suggest a preference for personal drama over the sport itself. This storytelling choice has led to criticism that "Break Point" is more akin to a soap opera than a sports documentary, prioritizing emotional engagement over an accurate representation of tennis's competitive nature and the athletes' dedication.

One cannot help but question the series' omission of tennis legends-the "Big 3": Novak Djokovic, Rafael Nadal, and Roger Federer. Their peripheral presence or near absence raises doubts about the documentary's commitment to showcasing the pinnacle of tennis excellence. By relegating these icons to the background, "Break Point" misses an opportunity to delve into the heart of what makes tennis truly captivating: the unparalleled skill, dedication, and sportsmanship of its greatest players.

In essence, while "Break Point" may find an audience among those who enjoy the interplay of personal dramas and sporting careers, it falls short for tennis aficionados seeking a deeper, more nuanced celebration of the sport. The series' shift from the courts' highs and lows to the behind-the-scenes drama may entertain some but ultimately does a disservice to the rich, multifaceted world of professional tennis. For viewers looking for a documentary that captures the true spirit and challenges of the sport, the search continues.

Ridley Scott's 'Napoleon' is a visually stunning film, showcasing the director's flair for epic battle sequences and historical detail. Joaquin Phoenix delivers a nuanced portrayal of the titular character, though the film struggles to delve into the deeper aspects of Napoleon's personality and motivations. The narrative attempts to cover his entire life, resulting in a lack of focus and emotional depth, particularly in the depiction of Napoleon's relationship with Josephine. While technically impressive, 'Napoleon' ultimately feels like a missed opportunity to explore the complexities of one of history's most iconic figures.

Father Stu" is a film that aims to depict a biographical story, but unfortunately, it falls short in several key areas. Firstly, the portrayal of the main character's pursuit of a romantic relationship is problematic. The film presents a stalking-like attitude, where the protagonist is persistent to the point of disregarding the woman's personal space and decision-making ability. This aspect, which might be interpreted as an eccentric American narrative trope, comes across as both unrealistic and concerning.

Moreover, the overall quality of the movie is disappointing. The acting fails to convincingly portray the characters' complexities and emotions, leaving much to be desired in terms of performance depth. The storyline, which is supposedly based on true events, comes off as implausible and poorly executed. If the story is indeed true, its translation to the screen has not done justice to the real-life events, instead rendering them as unconvincing and illogical.

In conclusion, "Father Stu" misses the mark in delivering a meaningful and respectful biographic narrative. The film's approach to romantic pursuit is questionable, the acting is underwhelming, and the story fails to engage or inspire. It's a disappointing effort in biographical storytelling.

"Killers of the Flower Moon" is a cinematic masterpiece that truly deserves my 9/10 rating. This film is not just a movie; it's an experience that engulfs you for its entire 3-hour duration. The storytelling is impeccable, with Martin Scorsese's direction elevating the narrative to new heights. The characters are not just well-written but are brought to life by phenomenal performances, making them resonate with the audience in a deeply impactful way.

The attention to historical detail is admirable, immersing viewers in a compelling and often untold chapter of American history. The cinematography is nothing short of breathtaking, with each frame meticulously crafted to enhance the storytelling. The score complements the visuals perfectly, adding an additional layer of depth to the film.

What stands out most, however, is how the film balances its narrative richness with emotional depth. It's a poignant exploration of themes that are as relevant today as they were in the era the film portrays. This film is not just entertainment; it's a thought-provoking journey that stays with you long after the credits roll.

In summary, "Killers of the Flower Moon" is a testament to Scorsese's genius as a filmmaker. It's a film that not only meets but exceeds expectations, solidifying itself as a significant work in the realm of cinema.

"Invisible boundaries between wealth and poverty, ability and disability, hope and despair are beautifully challenged in the 2011 French film, "Intouchables." Directed by Olivier Nakache and Éric Toledano, the movie stands as a testament to the power of human connection, transcending the confines of societal constructs.

The movie is a poignant narrative based on a true story that follows the life of Philippe, a wealthy quadriplegic, and Driss, a young man from the projects. At the crossroads of desperation and need, their paths intertwine in the most unexpected manner, proving that first impressions often mislead.

One of the standout elements of "Intouchables" is the electric chemistry between François Cluzet (Philippe) and Omar Sy (Driss). Sy, in particular, lights up the screen with his charm, wit, and raw energy, making it easy for viewers to understand how he breathed life back into Philippe's somber existence. Their dynamic remains refreshingly genuine and endearing, driving the narrative forward and capturing the essence of an unexpected friendship.

The film masterfully balances humor with depth. The comedic moments are not forced but stem from the organic interplay between the characters, making the audience laugh one moment and then ponder deep-seated societal issues the next. Its impeccable score, featuring classics like Ludovico Einaudi's "Una Mattina," further adds depth, weaving a sonic tapestry that elevates the storyline.

However, no movie is without its critiques. Some might argue that certain aspects of the film simplify complex societal issues, and it occasionally treads the line between genuine representation and the risk of perpetuating stereotypes. Nonetheless, its overall message of friendship, understanding, and redemption shines through, making it worthy of its acclaim.

In conclusion, "Intouchables" is a must-watch, not merely as a feel-good movie but as a reflection on the depth and breadth of human connection. It demonstrates how two vastly different worlds can come together, find common ground, and teach us that sometimes the most unlikely relationships can be the most impactful. A solid 9 out of 10 for this French masterpiece."

"Threads" (1984), is a terrifying, brutally honest, and deeply unsettling portrayal of nuclear apocalypse. It is a cinematic experience that transcends its small-screen origins, presenting a bleak and devastating picture of nuclear war and its harrowing aftermath.

"Threads" isn't merely a disaster movie - it is a careful examination of human survival, civilization, and the fragility of the social structures that bind us. Set in the industrial city of Sheffield, UK, the film chronicles the lives of ordinary people thrust into extraordinary circumstances. The storytelling here is immersive and impactful, providing a shockingly plausible look at the consequences of a nuclear conflict.

"Threads" is a chilling and essential piece of cinema that stands as a stark reminder of the possible horrors of nuclear war. Its uncompromising realism, profound social commentary, and devastating emotional impact make it a must-watch for any fan of thought-provoking cinema. It's a movie that isn't easy to forget and arguably shouldn't be. "Threads" serves as a potent deterrent against the glamorization of war, resonating with a timeless and powerful message of peace and survival.

When discussing films that leave a lasting impression, Oppenheimer is unquestionably one of those worthy of mention. From its breathtaking cinematography to its detailed character studies, this movie is truly a remarkable achievement.

There's an intricacy in the portrayal of J. Robert Oppenheimer, the 'father of the atomic bomb,' that creates a multidimensional and thought-provoking character. The film meticulously examines the moral and ethical dilemmas he faced during the development of one of the world's most destructive weapons, adding depth to the narrative and allowing audiences to experience the intense human drama.

One of the highlights of this film is the acting performances. The characters are brought to life with an intensity and dedication that is both stunning and captivating. The portrayal of Oppenheimer himself is especially commendable, embodying the internal struggle of a man burdened with unimaginable responsibility.

As for the technical aspects, Oppenheimer is a marvel. The cinematography is stunning, with every frame meticulously crafted, while the score adds another layer of immersion to this powerful historical drama. The film perfectly blends realism and artistic representation to create a visually arresting and emotionally charged experience.

While I have given Oppenheimer a 9 out of 10, I regret not seeing it in IMAX. The vast and detailed landscapes, the intricate design of the laboratories, the scale of the atomic bomb tests - all these elements would undoubtedly gain an additional level of awe-inspiring grandeur in the IMAX format. The IMAX experience, with its unrivaled picture quality and immersive sound, would truly elevate the already impressive cinematic spectacle that Oppenheimer offers.

In conclusion, Oppenheimer is a film that marries historical accuracy with compelling storytelling and extraordinary performances. It's a profound exploration of one man's journey and the immense impact of his creation on the world. The depth of the narrative, the masterful character development, and the visually striking cinematography make this film a must-watch. And if you have the chance, don't miss the opportunity to view it in IMAX for the fullest experience.

"Barbie" has always been a beacon of aspiration and fantasy for millions across the globe, and the 2023 movie continues to build upon that legacy. However, what sets this film apart from its predecessors is its surprising infusion of humor which elevates the story from the traditional, sparkling veneer of Barbie's world.

The movie makes a daring pivot from the doll's typically flawless persona, highlighting her humorous and human-like qualities. The result is a delightful concoction of wit, charm, and engaging storytelling. For those expecting a mere reiteration of the standard Barbie tropes, this film will be a pleasant surprise, as it dares to shake up the status quo with its fresh take.

The screenplay is an unexpected delight, with laugh-out-loud moments woven seamlessly into the narrative. The humor doesn't feel forced or out of place, rather it helps to break down the often-perfect facade of Barbie's world, making it more relatable to the audience. It's refreshing to see Barbie and her friends involved in hilarious situations, making the narrative enjoyable for both children and adults alike.

Moreover, the animation is top-notch, a delightful feast for the eyes. The detailing in each frame, the vibrant color palette, and the lifelike character animations truly capture the spirit of the Barbie world. The voice acting is commendable, breathing life into the beloved characters, and the comedic timing only adds to the film's charm.

The movie is not without its flaws. Some may argue that the plot is predictable and lacks depth, a criticism often faced by films in the Barbie franchise. Despite this, the film makes up for it with its humorous approach, which keeps the audience engaged throughout.

Overall, "Barbie" (2023) is a delightful, light-hearted film that offers a fresh and funny perspective on a beloved franchise. It retains its core appeal for younger audiences while adding elements of humor that can be appreciated by a broader demographic. If you're looking for a film that is brimming with fun, humor, and vibrant animation, then this is the movie for you.

From the lushness of the Amazon rainforest to the icy plains of the Arctic, "Our Planet" is a breathtaking journey through the diverse habitats that make our world so incredibly unique. The series stands as an unparalleled testament to the beauty and fragility of our environment, capturing the planet's wonders with a clarity and depth that's nothing short of groundbreaking.

The cinematography is spellbinding. Every frame feels like a masterstroke, capturing the minute details of animal behaviors to grand vistas that remind us of the Earth's magnificence. It's the sort of visual storytelling that can only be achieved through patient dedication, vast resources, and a profound respect for the natural world.

Narrated by the inimitable Sir David Attenborough, the series gains an additional layer of gravitas. His calming, knowledgeable voice guides us through each episode, imbuing the footage with meaning, context, and a heartfelt plea for conservation. Attenborough's passion for the natural world is palpable, making "Our Planet" not just a visual feast but an emotional and educational journey.

However, what makes "Our Planet" truly stand out is its commitment to showcasing the impact of climate change and human intervention on these ecosystems. The juxtaposition of pure, unbridled beauty with the stark realities of environmental degradation is both haunting and poignant. The series doesn't shy away from showcasing the tragic consequences of our actions but also instills hope, underlining the importance of conservation efforts and sustainable living.

In an age where the conversation around climate change and conservation is more vital than ever, "Our Planet" serves as a brilliant reminder of what's at stake. It's a call to action, a love letter to Earth, and an absolute must-watch for anyone who cherishes the world we live in.

To say it is brilliant would be an understatement. "Our Planet" is an evocative masterpiece that pushes the boundaries of what a documentary series can achieve, touching the hearts and minds of viewers and inspiring us all to play our part in safeguarding our shared home.

With the cinematic world constantly evolving, fans eagerly anticipated the release of "The Flash" (2023), with hopes that it would bring a fresh take on the beloved speedster. The DC universe, rife with compelling characters and intricate storylines, often sparks fierce debates about character interpretations, and "The Flash" was no exception.

Perhaps the most polarizing element of the movie was the portrayal of The Flash himself. To say the character was 'annoying' would be an understatement. Every quip, every expression, every gesture seemed calculated to irk the audience. There's an argument to be made about characters needing flaws and nuances to be relatable and human, but in this case, it felt like an overload, making the film a laborious experience for many.

One might wonder, was it necessary to make The Flash this irritating? On one hand, it could be a bold choice to highlight Barry Allen's struggle with his newfound powers, his insecurities, or his efforts to fit into the superhero community. Painting him as an outcast or as someone trying too hard to be accepted can be an interesting take, providing depth and layers to a character often seen simply as the 'fast guy'.

However, a line must be drawn between complexity and vexation. While the filmmakers might have aimed for a more humanized, imperfect Barry Allen, the result was an over-the-top annoyance that overshadowed the character's redeeming qualities. For many viewers, it became almost impossible to finish the movie due to this excessive portrayal.

In conclusion, while "The Flash" (2023) had its moments and will undoubtedly have its supporters, the overwhelming sentiment is that the portrayal of its titular character detracted more than it added. In the future, filmmakers should remember that while it's essential to make characters relatable and flawed, they mustn't alienate their core audience in the process.

"Scream VI" returns with its familiar blend of horror, suspense, and a dark undercurrent of humor, yet stumbles somewhat in offering a fresh iteration of the franchise. It is a continuation of the iconic series that takes on the meta-commentary of the horror genre, though the narrative veers perilously close to being just another drop in the already saturated pool of Hollywood sequels.

The film stays true to its roots, proudly waving its flag of cliches - the menacing phone calls, the chase sequences in dimly lit houses, and the signature ghost face mask. In many ways, it feels like a love letter to the earlier films. However, the formulaic approach doesn't quite manage to match the novelty or spark that marked the series' inception.

The cast delivers admirable performances, showing skill in jumping between fear, irony, and tension, but they can only work with what they've been given. The characters, while earnest, feel more like they're just going through the motions, serving the familiar narrative without really surprising or challenging the audience.

There are, however, standout moments in the movie. "Scream VI" does have its fair share of creative kills, punctuated by a biting, self-referential commentary on the horror genre that adds a level of wit to the proceedings. This is where the film really shines, building on its tradition of exploring the meta, yet these moments come across as fleeting in the overall canvas of the film.

For longtime fans of the franchise, "Scream VI" will offer a comfortable and somewhat nostalgic experience. Yet for those seeking a revolutionary or genre-defying experience, it falls short of expectations. Its predictable plot twists, while competently executed, lack the impact they once had.

In conclusion, "Scream VI" is not the worst installment of the franchise, but it also struggles to compete with the best. It seems to be caught in the no man's land of sequeldom - too tethered to its past to break free and create something utterly new, but still competent enough to offer an entertaining ride. With a blend of vintage Scream elements and a few flashes of brilliance, it scores a solid yet unspectacular 5 out of 10. It's a love it or hate it experience, definitely worth a watch for the die-hard fans but possibly a pass for the casual viewer.

"Sisu" directed by Jalmari Helander is the latest addition to the Scandinavian film industry's repertoire. Despite its promise, the film falls short in a number of key areas.

The most glaring issue of "Sisu" is, unfortunately, the acting. While the cast seems committed to their roles, their performances often feel forced and unnatural. This unconvincing acting leaves an undeniable gap between the characters and the audience, hindering any deep emotional connection that could have made the narrative more engaging.

Helander is known for his distinct directing style, often tapping into local folklore and mythology. In "Sisu", he tries to incorporate the concept of "Sisu" - a Finnish term loosely translated as strength of will, determination, perseverance, and acting rationally in the face of adversity. However, this concept is not as subtly presented as one would hope. Instead, it is exaggerated to a point where it is overly simplistic and on the nose, thus missing the mark in the nuanced exploration of the concept.

The production design and cinematography, however, are worth mentioning. The film captures the breathtaking natural beauty of Scandinavia with its icy vistas and austere landscapes. The visual storytelling in some sequences is truly noteworthy, creating an atmospheric blend of magic and realism that is unique to Helander's work.

Nevertheless, it's essential not to mistake novelty for quality. Just because "Sisu" is not a Hollywood production does not automatically make it a cinematic masterpiece. Some viewers may be drawn to its novelty and perhaps be inclined to overlook its flaws, but a critical eye would see beyond this. While it's important to support diverse voices in cinema, it should not come at the expense of critical evaluation.

"Sisu" has its moments and is a commendable attempt by Helander, but it misses the opportunity to truly explore its themes and characters. This film is an example of how even with a strong concept, execution is what truly matters in storytelling. As it stands, "Sisu" is a mediocre venture into the potential richness of Finnish culture and cinema.

In conclusion, while "Sisu" is a worthy exploration of Finnish resilience, its exaggerated presentation, lackluster acting, and insufficiently developed narrative dampen its overall impact. There is a profound sense of missed opportunity that overshadows the film's genuinely promising elements, making "Sisu" an average addition to the Scandinavian film scene.

Does this people know that Portugal i also part of this story? How they dare to make a documentary about the moors and not mention Portugal? Not only is not accurate but very very poor quality.

Portugal had a huge part of the 'reconquista' and for those that dont know, there was Portugal before there was Spain

Go to educated yourself before try to make a documentary.

Moors are not a distinct or self-defined people. The 1911 Encyclopdia Britannica observed that the term had "no real ethnological value."Europeans of the Middle Ages and the early modern period variously applied the name to Arabs and North African Berbers, as well as Muslim Europeans.

The term has also been used in Europe in a broader, somewhat derogatory sense to refer to Muslims in general especially those of Arab or Berber descent, whether living in Spain or North Africa. During the colonial era, the Portuguese introduced the names "Ceylon Moors" and "Indian Moors" in South Asia and Sri Lanka, and the Bengali Muslims were also called Moors. In the Philippines, the longstanding Muslim community, which predates the arrival of the Spanish, now self-identifies as the "Moro people", an exonym introduced by Spanish colonisers due to their Muslim faith.

In 711, troops mostly formed by Moors from northern Africa led the Umayyad conquest of Hispania. The Iberian Peninsula then came to be known in Classical Arabic as al-Andalus, which at its peak included most of Septimania and modern-day Spain and Portugal. In 827, the Moors occupied Mazara on Sicily, developing it as a port. They eventually went on to consolidate the rest of the island. Differences in religion and culture led to a centuries-long conflict with the Christian kingdoms of Europe, which tried to reclaim control of Muslim areas; this conflict was referred to as the Reconquista. In 1224, the Muslims were expelled from Sicily to the settlement of Lucera, which was destroyed by European Christians in 1300. The fall of Granada in 1492 marked the end of Muslim rule in Spain, although a Muslim minority persisted until their expulsion in 1609.

I love the series, if you are into dark and GOT type series, this one is for you, although some characters are a bit exaggerated aka Jaskier, he doesnt stop talking and sometimes its too much, good he doesnt appear on every episode.

Hard to follow up if you are not a native,

the guy keeps talking and really really fast, if understand italian you would be fine, if you need to read the subtitles you will miss half of it.

I had to stop watching, realty bad acting, bad kung fu scenes, i would really like to undertand how so many people see this movie as a kung fu classic?

The airport scene was really lame, if this wasnt the end of the series i would stop watching right way

Stopped watching after 10min, could get better after but i just couldnt stand for the too forced scenes, not really necessary if this supposed to be a action/thriller movie, is more like and low budget comedy

Being an oldie and a classic, i had some expectation, but i stop to write this review after the money scene, dont know how many of you agree, but the scene is really stupid, being an oldie im giving an discount, but this was too much... nice story so far, but kinda spoiled everything after this

its just me or Fiona character is really annoying, i am in the 5th season, and i'm sure if i will finish. The story line, representation, etc are getting worst and worst... at the beginning the things were fine, actually good, but somehow i feel is already too much, they could have this finish after 4th season, they just pushed to the limits for the audiences i guess, but i'm one of those that will make up my own ending, because i am no interested anymore

seeing people write so good reviews about this movie is what brought me... are you serious?? this is like the museum where someone forgot a lighter , and the pseudo intellectuals around appreciating it, like is some kind piece of art, this is movie is nothing but the worst movie ever, nonsense 0/10