manuvanamali1995

Some call it a thriller other say it a lawyer movie(specifically,'one of the greatest law movies').I don't know if they use some other material for their seeing purpose which cheat their eyes and thus even themselves.It's a pathetic movie.I watched 3 clooney movies consecutively after getting overwhelmed by seen 'Burn after reading" it is a very good satire movie.Love that one(congrats to COEN bros,love them too after this movie) What is George clooney? an MBA holder working as CFO in one of the MNCs ,if so he has performed very well. But i didn't download the movie to see how good he is in corporate affairs.A boring,not at all interesting movie.Good performance by actors.but i hate this movie.I got similar experiences from his recent 2 movies too(Syriana,Up in the air).All these films are like some David fincher movie with full of dialogues as if they were made to test the retention skills of actors,no twists,wits,action,comedy,sentiments .They are political movies dealing with contemporary American lives but ..as a movie it doesn't present the matters in a more digestible way with good stands ,but for that purpose a documentary is good don't waste our time by producing such 'Mr.Perfect man in Suite movies'.

It's a pathetic movie.I watched 3 clooney movies consecutively after getting overwhelmed by seen 'Burn after reading" it is a very good satire movie.Love that one(congrats to COEN bros,love them too after this movie) What is George clooney? an MBA holder working as CFO in one of the MNCs ,if so he has performed very well. But i didn't download the movie to see how good he is in corporate affairs.A boring,not at all interesting movie.Good performance by actors.but i hate this movie.I got similar experiences from his recent 2 movies too(Syriana,Michael Clayton).All these films are like some David fincher movie with full of dialogues as if they were made to test the retention skills of actors,no twists,wits,action,comedy,sentiments .They are political movies dealing with contemporary American lives but ..as a movie it doesn't present the matters in a more digestible way with good stands ,but for that purpose a documentary is good don't waste our time by producing such 'Mr.Perfect man in Suite movies'.

It's a pathetic movie.I watched 3 clooney movies consecutively after getting overwhelmed by seen 'Burn after reading" it is a very good satire movie.Love that one(congrats to COEN bros,love them too after this movie) What is George clooney? an MBA holder working as CFO in one of the MNCs ,if so he has performed very well. But i didn't download the movie to see how good he is in corporate affairs.A boring,not at all interesting movie.Good performance by actors.but i hate this movie.I got similar experiences from his recent 2 movies too(Up in the air,Michael Clayton).All these films are like some David fincher movie with full of dialogues as if they were made to test the retention skills of actors,no twists,wits,action,comedy,sentiments .They are political movies dealing with contemporary American lives but ..as a movie it doesn't present the matters in a more digestible way with good stands ,but for that purpose a documentary is good don't waste our time by producing such 'Mr.Perfect man in Suite movies'.

Clint Eastwood is a genius.Never expected such an emotional treat from Clint Eastwood.He is actually a role model for all people related to film industry all over the world.He creates his own new way with his own extraordinary,legendary style.Most of the actors are repeating their usual characters in every films and they are not trying to or they are not able to break the impediments in front of them.Clint east wood has no equals,he is a legend.he proves it in his all films.he is a great actor and above that he is an imaginative,creative,..director. this films doesn't have the usual contents of a Hollywood movie.no explosions no sex or no silly simple things we see in other movies. moreover it deals with the theme which seldom appears on Hollywood big screen-the problems of aged people,their loneliness etc. Eastwood has succeeded to discuss many important things that happens in American society nowadays,the Korean invasion,the habits and natures of new generation etc. the film has to be deeply studied to discuss the subjects presented inn it. it is remarkable film for Eastwood's acting and his perfect direction.

I read the reviews after watching the movie.I could find that many people gave it an average rating bcoz they don't think it is good comedy movie. Yes it is not a comedy movie like Jim carrey movies,hangover,or steve martin movies.Moreover it can be viewed as a satire on present American society.Everyone is wearing a mask and the husbands and wives cheat each other,uncontrolled use of personal guns(clooney kills brad pitt on a moment of anxiety),feeling insecurity regarding personal privacy(clooney asks the question"who are you?where are you from CIA,NSA?") I REALLY LOVED THE MOVIE.GOT MORE THAN I EXPECTED.NOW I AM A FAN OF THE COEN BROTHERS BY JUST WATCHING THEIR SINGLE WORK. Realized that Brad pitt has potential to do characters like this.i expected only serious roles from him. Recommended movie if you want thought provoking laughs.

Yeah it's an excellent movie.Shankar always do a great job.He is ,without no doubt the spiel berg of India. Vikram's best film of all time. one of the best films ever made in world cinema. Complete entertainer. if it was made in Hollywood it would have rcvd at least 4 Oscars 1.best actor 2.best action 3.best direction 4.best screen play

all directors must see this movie to study about how to direct a good entertainer.no flaws at all.3 hours of pure entertainment. the only drawback of this films is the actress i didn't like her. i love shankar movie.none of his films has failed in box office to say clearly they were very huge hits.

The film is slow yet very very interesting and not boring at all moving.The starting 30 minutes is just inside a house but Sam has done it very well.Sam should be applauded accordingly for his directorial skills that he has showed in this movie

Actors have done their best.Hanks, as usual at his best.the kid has also gone beyond all my expectations. But the best part of the movie is it's music.Thomas Newman(I really wonder how a human could possibly lost Oscar 11 times!!,he didn't get Oscar even for his tracks in shaw shank and wall e(!!!!!)).really sad. he has done an amazing job. the car driving scene of the kid is very interesting. i watched the movie after Skyfall(as usual waste of time like other bond movies).so i DIDN't expect anything from Sam but this movie really amazed me.

Yes,it is .It is another example for not to believe IMDb blindly. you can see awful movies like "Interview with a vampire","Avengers","let the right one in","cabin in the woods","signs" rated above 7.5 without any sense .while some good movies like this one and "the big year" severely underrated. This is one of the best movies i have ever seen.Meg Ryan's performance is really charmful,enthusiastic,simply makes us laugh. i heard about it from my elder sister about an year ago,then i thought that it's just another lagging romantic movie,usually i'm not fond of romantic movies.but this movie really amazed me. Joyful and good performance of tom and Meg Ryan are one of the best performance i've ever seen.

beautiful,simple,must watch..wanna see again

After watching that movie, we concluded that the poster reviewer either was completely high, wandered into the wrong theater by mistake, or thinks that Schindler's List was a wacky comedy. The Road has to be one of the most depressing, pointless, excruciating movies you could ever see. It will make you want to go home and stick your head in the oven.

The first 7 hours of the movie contain an endless slog through a desolate landscape bereft of plant and animal life. Only bugs and humans remain, somehow. Everything else on Earth has been burnt or smashed by some unacknowledged Doomsday Event. The director leaves it up to the audience to somehow figure out what kind of reasonable scientific explanation could account for anyone surviving for any amount of time after all the oxygen-producing plant life plus everything else in the food chain between bugs and people bit the dust. Apparently it happens through the magic of Dole Pineapple Chunks, the search for which takes up another 4 hours of movie.

Once you get inured to this laugh riot, you eventually start to disassociate from the main characters. The Boy in the book is supposed to be 6 or 7. In the movie, though, he looks to be about 10 or 11, but seems to still act 6 or 7. He comes across as a total feeb and you start to wonder how a kid born on the cusp of a complete apocalypse manages to have such poor coping skills. The Kid was supposed to have been running into dead bodies and cannibals practically every day of his life so you'd think he'd be over it after 9-10 years, but no, he manages to seem traumatized at every instance.

Dad doesn't help things out much as he spends his days talking to the kid like he's three and tucking him in and carrying him around every chance he gets. I'm sure that'll help grow hair on his chest, Dad! It's nice to see that no matter how shitty the world gets, there's always a parent willing to overshelter their kid from the reality of their situation.

Dad also seems to make poor survival decisions. The poorest decision comes when the two find a friggin' BOMB SHELTER FILLED WITH FOOD AND WARM BEDS, but after a couple days they need to abandon it because they heard somebody walking around up top. Apparently this is the only bomb shelter in existence that didn't come with a lock on the hatch, and everyone knows how easy it is for a starving bum to breach a cement bunker with a steel trap door on it. It's much easier to pile a bunch of crap in an old push wagon and hit the road again to defend it in the open air against every marauder and sneak thief that walks by, while you slowly die from exposure.

But one can't point fingers at such glaring plot holes, because This Is Such A Serious, Award-Winning Oscar Contender! You can tell this movie is an Oscar contender because the kid cries real tears and there are at least a couple scenes where the audience gets treated to a rear view of Viggo's naked ass and nutsack. Everyone knows that if Viggo is letting you see his junk, he's very much into his role and you should respect his process by taking his nuts very seriously like he does.

There's a scene somewhere in the middle where The Mom (Charlize Theron) decides to end it by walking out into the freezing winter in her sleep shirt to die in the woods, because she can't take it anymore. By the end of the movie, you'll be wishing you'd walked out in the middle too.

I have seen IRON MAN 1 & I like the movie.but Iron man 2&3 are mere waste of time.When i heard abt a movie which contains many super heroes i expected something good.And Iwas by seeing it is rated 8.9 in the first day.I had expected A good story ,good acting,good actions and VFXs.But i could only find the last thing in the movie.I downloaded a HD print of 2.5 GB within 8 days but after watching the movie i realized that i wasted my whole time.I don't like captain America in his own movie too.He is not powerful and the actor is completely disappointing in the role. 5-6 superheroes to fight against a halfly retarded villain?Only hulk did provide some entertainment. spent a large portion of the film wondering where Hawkeye kept getting arrows from. I understand that this was a summer blockbuster. That alone makes me cut it a little slack, but honestly, I just don't understand how it made a billion dollars. I also don't understand how the Black Widow's presence in the final battle (a largely aerial one) wasn't like bringing a knife to a gunfight.I don't like captain America in his own movie too.He is not powerful and the actor is completely disappointing in the role. 5-6 superheroes to fight against a halfly retarded villain?Only hulk did provide some entertainment.Loki had something to do in THOR that was a better movie than this.

The movie version of "21 Jump Street" was supposed to be a comedy, I guess. And I guess you would think it's funny if you love the same old jokes about penises over and over from beginning of the movie to the very end, literally.

I thought the movie was going to show how two older, wiser guys go back to high school as undercover cops, and show those young kids what's up. THAT would have been interesting. Instead, they go right back to how they were as kids, bumbling and fumbling their way along, and doing a LOT of stupid things as well.

The juvenile behavior the two leads exhibit ruins any dramatic elements of the movie. They don't act like two adults pretending to be kids, they act more like two kids pretending to be cops.

The original 21 Jump Street with Johnny Depp was a good show. The movie version with Channing Tatum and Jonah Hill was just dumb, sorry.

This is easily Tatum's worst film, and I can't stand Jonah Hill. Hill is not funny, just annoying, and it makes sense that he co-wrote the script.

You can tell Hill has no idea what a cool person is actually like, so he throws in about a hundred penis jokes, along with the usual drug and sexual comments, which take no imagination or creativity at all. Disgusting unfunny filth,better to step away this mess.

After a lot of searches and researches to find a good horror movie i reached this title.Read the reviews and got a good impression about the movie.But sorry to say that this one of the worst movies I have ever seen. dragging story and dialogues.not thrilling at all. It Is like seeing some award movies.It's a very bad movie.Bad direction,bad acting,no music i think,if you wanna waste your time better go and read "the inferno" or see "avengers". I think there is no good horror movie in recent times(CABIN IN THE WOODS IS A DISASTER.I'M WONDERING HOW DID THAT MOVIE GET 7 RATING?.First problem is this it is not English,but i have seen many other good movies which are other than English.Such as life is beautiful AND SONG OF SPARROWS.They very good movies and no need to hear the dialogues.

Is this some kind of a joke? Are there cameras that filming people's reactions and laughing at them or what? It was AFWUL! It was neither scary nor funny. I hated myself that I didn't leave the theater after the first 15 minutes.

The only scary and the best scene of the movie was the guy appeared suddenly at the old gas station. The movie is that bad...

Too bad I can't rate it less than 1.t was predictable from the start (why did that eagle have to hit the invisible boundary to the cabin? It made the later scene with the motor bike jump completely redundant). The acting was poor and even though the film may be satirical it is still painful to watch.

The only thing I do like is perhaps the idea of an ode to all horror films and horror characters, but if it is a parody than that wouldn't make sense.

I am just so surprised that this film currently has 7.9 / 10. Am I missing something here??? Unless you are from the new generation who loves nonsense bloody scenes and find them funny and somehow scary; STAY AWAY FROM THIS MOVIE!