What is wrong with you people? What do I mean by you people?! I mean you internet critics, are you just so pretentious that not even good movies are up to your standards? If it isn't a Christopher Nolan or James Cameron film then it's just garbage? Okay, preference in movies is opinionated I get that. But as film critics you are not there to judge overall films by simple minded "Duhhhh did I like it? No" you are supposed to break them down in characters, story, imagery, acting, scenery and dialog. Also you won't be able to correctly judge a film without empathy.
Sorry, I just wanted to make sure people understood how to critique a film. Because for this film to win almost a dozen Razzies one of which being "The worst film of the decade" for 1980's clearly shows the majority of critics forgot how to critique a film. I guess it's possible the Razzies never had a sense of good judgement to begin with but wouldn't there be at least one person there who would come out and say "Maybe the films we make fun of aren't bad maybe we're just stupid?" sadly it hasn't happened it.
Anyways on to the movie... Mommie Dearest is a movie adaptation of a book written by Christina Crawford the adopted daughter of Joan Crawford. The book is about Christina's childhood and relationship with her mother, who is a famous actress. The book showcases alcoholism, child abuse, child neglect and the cold harsh reality of Hollywood. The book was praised by many writers but it was also lashed at by many of Joan's friends. The book had caused a bit of controversy whether or not it was true. Christina's brother was mentioned in the book to have witnessed many events. He defended Christina and the book saying "I never for one moment believed our mother loved any of us. It was all about publicity for her."
This is important to the film because it was around this time the book had become a large debate. Many said it gave Joan a bad image and those claims were not true. This is where the "comedy" claim comes in, afraid whether the events were true or not as well as the growing reputation the film was a comedy the producers decided to add a tagline "Meet the biggest MOTHER of them all" but they never claimed it to be a comedy. It was not because the movie bombed at the box office, as a matter in fact it did the exact opposite. The budget and cost was 5 million, they made 39 million if that's a bomb to you then you failed basic math.
Faye Dunaway's performance in this film is some of the best acting in film. Joan Crawford was over the top, she was the queen of being over the top. Faye not only portrayed the pain and suffering of what it was like to be an aging female actress in the cutthroat Hollywood world but her desire to be loved and adored. The scenes of child abuse are chilling. If you think the coat hanger scene is funny, I'm sorry but there's something wrong with you. A child being beaten with a coat hanger shouldn't come off as funny, unless the child is the kid from the Star Wars prequels.
In all seriousness if a friend wanted to see a good example of acting I'd show him this film. Faye is not only gorgeous but extremely terrifying, it's such a misconception that it only makes her more evil. Faye playing as Joan... yeah I can't help but find that attractive. She lures you in then makes you regret it. I will admit later in the film we see an older Christina Crawford and yeah that acting is slightly odd but if you were beaten with coat hangers, yelled at then sent off to a boarding school cause you were the one being "bad" you would be slightly off too.
I don't really like drama movies, hell I'm a comic book nerd. I do reviews of video games. I shouldn't be the voice of reason here! I will repeat myself for the morons over at the Razzies... actually considering how incredibly idiotic they are I should say their name to get their attention, might be a good idea to jingle keys in front of their face just to keep it long enough to say this but whatever.
David Denby / New York Magazine David Sterrittt / Christian Science Monitor ...Christian Science what is that the Justice League for Religion and Atheist? And of course the ring leader Head RAZberry John Wilson
Your heads are in a very censored place for a IMDb review, would you kindly remove your heads from this dark crevice and GROW UP! Or go pursue a career in something else, something that doesn't require thoughtful analysis.