vinyaasi

This may only concern empaths: those people who are so electrosensitive that they may benefit from how to reduce or eliminate electrosmog while "Earthing" when they sleep at night.

Earthing is bionically grounding the body to the Earth especially whenever sleeping, but also at any time, to shut off auto-immune disorder and all of its consequences.

It's been determined by Clint Ober, author of the book: "Earthing", that our body was designed to remain electrically connected to the Earth at all times.

He was a cable guy (owned a cable company before retiring) when he discovered that we are insulated from our Mother Earth to our own misfortune.

John Cejka was a friend of John Bedini. The former invented a psychotronic device to kill pests in a farmer's field without having to directly apply insecticide. I read about this invention (approved by the Dept. of Agriculture) back in the 1970s in the book, entitled, "The Secret Life of Plants", by Peter Tompkins and Christopher Bird.

I'm an empath. I'm sensitive to electro-pollution, also known as: electrosmog. So much so, that when I ground myself to the Earth when I sleep at night, I have to avoid the use of the house wiring ground connection due to its proximity to the hot wire which bleeds an A/C hum into the ground and neutral wires as an EM broadcast occurring between adjoining wires running through the same electrical conduit inside the walls of our buildings.

I also have to run my Earthing connecting wire outside through my bedroom window and plant it into the Earth many feet (yards) away from any house mains since that is where the building's ground wire is connected to the Earth.

But that's not enough...

I also have to connect the positive terminal of a dry cell battery to my Earthing line (and NOT connect the negative battery terminal to anything) to suppress electrosmog since I am so sensitive that without all of these protective measures, my heart would weaken its beat and increase the likelihood of heart failure a little earlier in life (than it should otherwise) since I have a tendency to push myself, too much, in activity.

I'm an activist! What can I say?

Voltage sources are considered to be voltage regulators. And a D/C signal will suppress voltage perturbations arising from electrosmog.

After writing my review for the Newman documentary, by Jon Fox,..

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2198063/

... and thinking it over, I realized that this movie (Vision, Blind Spot) - in its own way - is duplicating the other movie's documentation of the struggle between sovereign men and women who find themselves "bucking something much larger themselves" - in Newman's case, the Patent Office and in this case, the NSA. Since agencies exist under the umbrella of the federal government, and since the US of A is defined in its federal codes and regulations as a corporation (since ~1872), the analogy which I'm drawing here between these two films makes it very easy to respect the intention of this film's creators regardless of their quality of execution (as is so aptly decried by just about all of the other reviews of Visions - Blind Spot. Maybe it's just as well that this movie's creators didn't do a more "slick job", for I know what happens to those movies...

Take Jonathan Livingston Seagull...

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070248/

It has one lone seagull bucking the seagull establishment and he ends up training a few others to live outside the flock. That movie was never distributed very well - in my opinion - as an effective technique to keep it from becoming more popular. It's book, from which the movie was taken from, was far more popular. The "Karate Kid" series of movies came out shortly afterward promoting a more violent approach to settling conflicts and making conflict resolution the main theme of life. I guess that appeals more to people then does the pursuit of yoga which the Jonathan Seagull character had been pursuing.

My point is that you can blame the movie for being not worth watching, or you can blame our culture for producing failed movies which have a good message worth watching if only it had been made different, or promoted and distributed differently, .... yada, yada, yada..... fill in your own excuse for bad-mouthing any movie's lack of this, that or the other thing, for it amounts to the same complaint, that...

We don't deserve anything better than what we've got.

Unless, of course, we do something about it. Prayer is a good start, but has to be followed up by some action. It doesn't have to be flamboyant action. But action nonetheless.

Fraud is the most difficult thing to disprove. And film-fantasies tend to create characterizations of criminals parallel to the characterizations of inventors functioning outside of social norms.

Newman was crucified on his own cross of proprietary ambition - which says nothing of the caliber of his device, but instead - says everything about our characterization as a society hell-bent on crucifying anyone who thinks, feels, or acts in a manner which discomforts us.

If we had backed him instead of crucifying him, then our society - as we know it - would collapse.

We take our corporate world too much for granted. Our money would become worthless if free energy dominated all of our machinery. Quality of life would replace the Gross National Product as a measuring rod of how well we're doing. And sovereignty would replace eminent domain....

Eminent domain is the presumed right of local governments to seize the property of individuals. This is what happened in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in violation of the Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution which prohibits abuse of power under "color of authority".

....amounting to heresy in today's world wherein the individual is less important than is our corporate government.

Newman had the backing of physicists, but that was short-lived.

He had the backing of the public. But that died out once we lost him in our collective focus.

We are taught innumerable lies, such as this one: when Charlton Heston's character, in the Planet of the Apes movie, sees a broken Statue of Liberty fallen to the ground at the close of that movie indicating that he had not traveled to another planet, but -instead- had merely traveled forward in time within his own planet. The implication, in this cinematic fantasy, is that the only way for the sovereignty of the individual to return and the eminent domain of governments to die out is for us to return to our prehistorically, barbaric ways of life.

This is not true, but is what we are encouraged to believe so as to avoid another possibility: that our institutions will die - not our culture - since it is the centralization of institutionalized power that holds back the avant-garde inventor. The Industrial Revolution only helps our institutions. It does not help the sovereign inventor, for he has to help himself.

Newman can't rescue us. We have to rescue ourselves just as he rescued himself from the ignorance of pathological science quagmired in stock expressions along with a lack of knowing how the misapplication of those socially contrived idioms is flawed - not the expressions, themselves.

Take, for example, the expression: "Energy OUT (must equal) energy IN". That is a derivation of finite Quality factor. Thus, energy cannot come OUT to a greater degree than it goes IN for, then, it would transcend the duration of energy's bandwidth becoming a dimensionless moment: the ETERNAL NOW. This latter possibility gives an infinite Quality Factor, also known as an infinite Q -- considered improbable or impossible by conservative scientists who don't possess the wherewithal to improvise a solution, namely: a method whereby an electric motor may obtain usable energy from an artificially contrived, negative power factor by converting it at a cost far less than to produce it. Ergo, free energy.

This is what Joseph Newman managed to accomplish, but kept his proprietary secret to himself. Nowhere inside his book, nor in any of his public disclosures, did he divulge his secret. Well, here it is...

His original design is what he openly confessed to, that of: a permanent magnet, or set of same, rotating at a slow rate in the middle of a massive copper coil. This will NOT give overunity no matter how large it is constructed. Yet, this is all wannabe replicators have had to work with all these years!

At some point in time, somewhere around the middle of the 1980s, he switched to an improved design (given to him by Byron Brubaker, an electrical engineer from Indiana known as MX6Maximus on YouTube and Facebook) in which Newman was instructed to substitute the rotating bar magnet/s with a glass canister of helium wrapped with an open coil. That means, a coil which is not connected to itself, nor to anything else. Simply, a piece of wire wrapped around this canister with its two ends insulated so as to not make electrical connection to anything including the air (lest arcing occur).

If you look up the properties of helium, you'll find that it will not respond to an electromagnetic field. But it WILL respond to an electrostatic field by creating an EM field of its own at a relatively high frequency.

His motor coil was so massive on purpose. This was to save energy coming from the battery by restricting the flow of current, and accumulate a huge electrostatic field -- something the open coil wrapped around the glass canister of helium could respond to and retain long enough to transfer this voltage to the helium.

Once excited, the helium will put out a high frequency, electromagnetic field which will radiate out of the helium and return back to the massive coil to boost its amperage just enough to neutralize the battery's current coming out to send approximately half an ampere back to the battery pack to recharge it.

Voila! Overunity at no additional cost to the battery pack, nor to the rotating canister!

Did Newman fail us? Did he fail himself? Did he fail to share his proprietary technology with us before he died?

Maybe, now, his legacy may be redeemed. For in truth, we are released from our prison of ignorance.