A lot of irrelevant material from the investigative journalist telling us he used a paper map instead of GPS to go to the trial to the psychologist who never met or studied the unabomber.
We get no real insights into what he believed in or thought apart from just a few out of context chunks of his interview which should be the main point of focus especially since the show is called in his own words. The audio/video collected is not enough with the same pictures shown over and over again.
Cheap reality-TV-like content overall, it's a shame because it's a very interesting subject that in the right hands could be made into an amazing series.
7 out of 10 found this helpful