User Reviews (18)

Add a Review

  • It's hard to find a single good aspect of the movie, except for strong acting from romanian star Gheorghe Dinica and surprisingly nice performance of Valentin Teodosiu, an actor which i my opinion deserves better roles then he usually gets in movies.

    For the rest, the didactic speech of the main character, spread over half the movies, practically kills any interest for the picture quite quickly.

    Mr Nicolaescu should realise that the audience is hardly interested in his vision about nobility, or in a romantic image of the last days of the romanian aristocracy.

    With the two exceptions already mentioned, acting is 70'ish and of a poor quality, the movie has lost of clichés and generally speaking, without being a horrible experience, is practically a waste of time to watch.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I must say it was a test of inner strenght to watch the whole movie, this is one of the worst products of Romanian cinematography...but then again none of Mr. Nicolaescu's films impressed me. Just a waste of budget money...

    As always, he is the director and the main character but he is no Charlie Chaplin, as well as being a bad director, he is a horrible actor, I don't understand why had to make just another movie centered on his character(an 80yr old "prince" that makes all the women love him with desperation)

    In his quest for adulation, Nicolaescu inserted some cheesy lines, like "youth is wasted on the young" and (as many times before) decided to make it all dramatical by killing almost everybody in the end. Don't watch this movie...it's a waste of time
  • I've seen this movie, and it is great. The actors are some of the best, but Sergiu Nicolaescu wanted to do something different, so he brought in some new ones.

    I have seen most of Sergiu Nicolaescu's movies, and THERE IS NO COMUNIST PROPAGANDA IN THEM WHATSOEVER!!! I do not know what absolute idiot chose to comment this movie first...but it is obvious that he did not understand anything from it....probably his intellect is to low...

    He said that Nicolaescu's movies are o no quality...but that proves that he is an imbecile... Sergiu Nicolaescu is one of the greatest directors, and many people agree that he is the greatest "battle scene director" in the world.

    His movies are filled with "patriotism" because they have a history based topic. It is obvious that these high quality movies are not for idiots...

    Orient Express is an extraordinary movie...a MUST SEE for anyone who can understand it.
  • You know, Sergiu Nicloaescu...he's a man most people living in Romania have heard of. As a matter of fact, when I participated at a certain seminar and people were asked to name a Romanian film director, his name popped up on most of the lists. I hadn't seen any of his films and simply had to be intrigued by such a seemingly mesmerizing person.

    I suppose you all know the saying "Don't judge a book by its cover". It hardly applies, but you catch my drift. If art didn't have any political implications, maybe we'd have missed many masterpieces along the years. However, there is a certain limit where it all has to end. Most unfortunately, limits (still) tend to be overshadowed and misplaced around here...which might well explain a thing or two.

    The film just isn't in any way how I imagined it to be. There's little of a storyline to follow, for it's a...aham, character study. Take note, authentically ONE character. Obviously, Nicolaescu's. The film goes so far as to harass the dignity an active human brain might possess. Nicolaescu's self-obsession is rather pregnant throughout the gazillion minutes the movie stretches and ends up being a severe insult brought not only to movie goers, but to the whole Romanian nation. It may sound harsh, but it's a fact, because it's an issue of image and we're way behind on this. 2004 really wasn't a glamorous year for Romanian cinema, but to present "Orient Express" to a foreign public is similar to inflicting yourself cut wounds. Luckily enough, such wounds heal, but it can take a while. About the film, well...people act very strange in the mystic forests around the prince's castle, while the superficial image of society is tasteless and hollow. Were it not for the unexpected beginning, I'd dare to say it's an endless bore. And, actually, it is.

    Nicolaescu's effort consists of gathering a mostly talentless cast (not endangering his superior position) and then shooting an absolutely disappointing flick. I suppose he's got at least one good film in his credits, however, with Orient Express, he proves to be a most untalented director. 3/10
  • I have seen the movie, and I think it's the renaissance of the Romanian cinematography. I liked it, I've always liked the aristocrat movies, and I think the director Sergiu Nicolaescu has proved once more that he is the most famous Romanian movie director ever. The Romanian cinematography has had a crack-up after the 1989-revolution which demolished communism, but now I think it started to come back again. It was a very nice surprise watching this movie and it gave me confidence for the future Romanian movies. I want to invite everyone to see it and then judge. I felt very sorry seeing some negative comments from some users, and mostly because they were Romanians... It's strange how some people like to pull down every good thing which happens in this country...
  • I know most of Sergiu Nicolaesu's work and somehow in my early childhood back in Romania I enjoyed it. There were mainly war movies going all the way from The Romans and Dacians till The Second World War battles. But this one is a caricature of a flick... No substance, bad acting, no camera movement just to name a few... The actors are incredible dull and shallow and the plot... but what the hack... there is no plot, just a narcissistic character with some gushy women orbiting around him. It seems as it was intended to be a C movie from the start and hopefully it does. So save your ticket and popcorn money for something more interesting.
  • "Orient Express" is a very good Romanian version of the classic movie "Il Gattorpardo" ("The Leopard" - en.). Unfortunately, like other Romanian movies, it's not a universal movie, it's a Romanian movie - difficult to understand for other culture. Of course, there is a difference between Nicolaescu and Burt Lancaster, but as director Sergiu Nicolaescu did a great movie. A bad element is that some romantic moments can be remarked as a little bit artificial, but we must not forget the environment, the circumstances of those years (between first and second word war)with a snobbery society. I also appreciated very much the music.

    For me it's a "must see movie".
  • Sergiu Niculescu is indeed quite a famous Romanian director. He actually got most of his fame by shooting war movies during the Ceaucescu area and he seems to have been quite good at it. He is now a controversial old man, a Senator and his word is key in funding Romanian movies with public money.

    In Orient Express his character is played by two actors (himself) and Dan Bitman (the younger character) who is a well-know rock-star in Romania. The all plot is just an amazing example of self-praise and narcissism. No less than 4 women are actually in love with the Niculescu-character. The dialogs and shooting are flat and static. Barely any camera moves except for one or two traveling.

    The film fails to capture the audience. When I watched it, the public laugh during the most pathetic/romantic moments...

    The film recalls the spirit of a Niculescu earlier film: Ultima Noapte de Dragoste, shot in 1979.

    The only interesting part is the lovely Miclauseni castle located closed to Iasi (North-Est Romania) where part of the movie has been shot.
  • The kind of movie that let's you in it even though you left the cinema for a while. Makes room for that pure epic performance very few Romanian movies have. And still all that drama is Noble, not shocking. It let's you know that higher class is maybe not so bad, maybe dirt is not so much better then cleanliness, and it spits on every single movie promoting common things we see every day. A very brave movie because it doesn't try to make ordinary people feel good about themselves, it doesn't use issues that most people find themselves in. It has almost no connection to the real world, or any significant parts of Romanian history. It's a solitary and original movie from all points of view. A production that's worth respect.
  • This is a great movie, worthy to compete against American movies from Hollywood. Sergiu Nicolaescu is one the greatest Romanian Director and even actor! Now he is old but he written history with his achievements and he will always be remembered as the first greatest Romanian actor and movie director! The new actors and directors are jokes! He is the only one that remains true! This movie was very touchy and realistic! The story was very good and if you're not Romanian you should search for a subtitle in your language then look at the movie! I rated the movie at maximum because it really worths!

    P.S. If you're looking for a great Drama, Romance movie, here it is, if you want something else, this is not a good place to look...
  • twenty-four-fps24 August 2005
    Warning: Spoilers
    I have recently watched Orient Express on DVD (one of the very few Romanian DVDs/VHS provided with English subtitles !), and wish to provide IMDb's readers with a few comments.

    The film is not that bad as some might believe. Directorial effort by Sergiu Nicolaescu, screen-writing, and casting with some flaws. Sergiu Nicolaescu is known well for pictures such as: "Michael the Brave" (1970), "With Clean Hands" (1972), "The Immortals" (1974), "The Doom" (1976). "William the Conqueror" (1982), "The Mirror" (1993), "Cry of Redemption" (1996), many of them action and war films. I dare say "Orient Express" (2004) is one of his few attempts at making a "character" film, and he does better than with the his previous attempt: "The Last Night of Love" (1979) based on the novel bearing the same title by Romanian 20th century writer Camil Petrescu.

    It is an interesting story, and I assume the novel by Tudor Teodorescu-Braniste upon which the script is based is even better, meaning more fully developed.

    Good shooting and editing, good acting. For interior and exterior shooting nice choosing of the Moruzeni Castle located in the always very beautiful and fully forested Moldova.

    At first glance it looks like Sergiu Nicolaescu as old prince Morudzi performs rather flat, however the character he plays is supposed to be flat with few emotional variations. Dan Bittman (a Romanian rock star) does well as young prince Morudzi. I liked Imola Kezdi ("Holtvágány 1973) as Ana Criveanu, who falls in love for the prince, and later on kills herself when rejected by the prince, although I had the feeling she did not look exactly like a 20 years old girl, as the script requires. Maia Morgenstern ("The Oak" - 1992, "Betrayal" - 1993, "Ulysses' Gaze" - 1995, Procust's Bed" – 2001, "The Passion of Christ" 2004) is excellent as Amalia Frunzetti, the prince companion and mistress, though she does not look like 30 (Maia was 42 in 2004 when the film was made). Ioana Moldovan is an attractive woman, and perform well as Isabelle Benny, the prince's love interest while wondering as a young man in Paris, however, she looks more like a tramp, instead of the supposedly poor and simply dressed French girl.

    In my opinion director and writer Sergiu Nicolaescu tag teaming with the screen writers (Ioan Carmazan, Corneliu Dragomirescu should have worked more at showing what else prince Morudzi did throughout his life besides traveling and gambling in Paris. It is not unthinkable, however, are playboy attitude, good look, and highly cultivate language enough for so many women to fall for him right away ? I would have also liked to see more about the neighborhood, the places and people living around the castle, which is something that would have allowed the viewer to get a better feel of the time (pre WW1). Last but not least, much more of that Moldavian (Romanian) mesmerizing music.

    About the DVD release: rather effective (mostly true to the original Romanian script) and easy to follow English subtitles, however, the person who did the translation seemed to have used some kind of "didactic", Romanian-English Dictionary – based equivalents for many Romanian idioms. A more "down-to-earth" British and American English was within reach.

    Last, but not least: some viewers have a problem with Sergiu Nicolaescu having been a well-connected individual for a long time, and also with his currently being a Senator in the Romanian Parliament. How about the Mikhalkov brothers (Nikita and Andrej Michalkow-Kontschalowski), the famous Russian theater and film directors ? Very well-connected artists, whose father, Sergei Mikhalkov wrote the lyrics for National Anthem of the USSR, now the Russian Federation ! They did outstanding work.
  • ... This movie is made for people who use their brains, and is seeking some answers to the world main questions.If you are wild about action, guns, sf or horror i assure you that you won't find these elements in it but instead it is a great psychological trip in a personal view.And I could say that the movie is more than a personal introspection into the character's body, is made to satisfy all categories of ages and is trying to measure what is worthing to do in life.It is a great gift that has been given by a great mind, Sergiu Nicolaescu. Take it as it is and please have at least a little more respect for someone who sacrificed his life on cinematography's altar. Thank you for reading this, Mihnea
  • The movie's overall has a great taste for anyone who loves crime and mystery.

    For those who know the actor is not worth seeing this movie unless you leave aside your prejudism and think that Sergiu Nicolaescu is not in fact Sergiu Nicolaescu.

    The actor here looks old - white hair and rids on his face. Don't judge. This movies implies simplicity and intelligence altogether. The actor does not wear any makeup and leaves his character to be seen as it is.

    The plot is not all the way sincere because thats how all mysterious plots are. In the end it is felt and revealed what really happened.

    It is a movie that requires patience and analysis. If you possess any of these skills then you will find this movie significant and mesmerizing.

    I consider that by far this is an excellent movie.

    Dan
  • sorce_sv15 January 2005
    Warning: Spoilers
    I saw it and I loved it! I think this could be one of the best films of Nicolaescu's! Great directing, a great script and great acting are the high points of this movie. I also love the filming locations: those places are fascinating! There is nothing wrong with this movie. Of course it could have been better. But, in this case, "better" means "the best!". I'm so proud because "Orient Express" is great! It makes me feel so good being a Romanian. :)

    I recommend this to all: it's a romance/drama very, very deep and cool! You'll love this picture!

    9/10
  • it has many sins of Sergiu Nicolaescu films. in same measure, its great vulnerability are the dialogues. artificial, theatrical, unconvincing. the good point - the atmosphere. and the nice choice for Dan Bittmann in the role of young Moruzi. sure, it is a homage of director to himself. it is obvious this fact but not so bad. because, after the end, important is the voice from the past. the nostalgia and the lost beauty, the flavor of pink novels and the remember of Ecclesiastes. film about a life. about love, friendship, greed and selfishness. about lost of the beauties of the youth. and about memories. nothing original but enough for a not so boring trip.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Like the Titanic or some expensive old-timer the Orient Express is more than a simple mean of transport:it represents traveling in luxury,providing stability,comfort and elegance seldom to be achieved today.Even more,Nicolaescu tried to turn his film into an own version of Titanic,the luxury train being the only reminder an old prince has of his past.Like Rose De Witt Bukater remembers her youth always in connection with the Titanic in its glory days,the old prince eventually "meets" persons from his past in the Orient Express-this is the way his approaching death is depicted,much like the way Rose from Titanic ends,in an endless kiss from her late lover,surrounded by other dead persons,becoming alive and kicking in the famous ship before its sinking. Besides Titanic,Nicolaescu imitates visibly Visconti's Gattopardo,even Nicolaescu's very stylishly trimmed beard and mustache obviously reminding of Burt Lancaster's looks while he played Don Fabrizio Di Salina,however without being able to compete with Lancaster's acting skills. The rest is typically Nicolaescu:he changes the action from the original novel significantly(by the way read the book,much better than the film),introducing new characters,changing names,twisting plots and even the outcome of the character's actions.It goes so far that characters which don't die in the book are here sacrificed(in the tear-jerking Titanic or Legends of the Fall style),only to make things more melodramatic. The message of the film is even more(falsely)didactic:everything stresses upon how inhuman the prince is,sort of Sade,Dorian Grey or Mephisto capable only to stylishly pervert the lives of the adorable,idyllic simple people(a Communist bias concerning the decay of the "exploiters"),therefore he must fail.In fact,the character shows only a certain fascination towards fleeing from reality,but maybe this is his way to show his human side-note that Don Fabrizio wasn't inhuman either,bearing a very intense emotional life under his cold aristocratic elegance.The proletarian anger against the ruling classes is simply annoying-even if an aristocrat's conduct might seem awkward to the common man,getting to know the values of the aristocrats eventually enables a different viewpoint. This film would have been great,but only with another director and another actor in the main part.
  • I saw this film yesterday. with fear to be a disappointment. as piece for define Nicolaescu silhouette. and my verdict is not very enthusiastic - it is a self-portrait, a will and , in same measure, a grave. because it reflects his world. his vision. about himself and about Romanian society. because long speeches and not inspired dialogs are bricks for his posterity. it is a chaotic melancholic movie. a show of lessons. and broken stories. remarkable presence - Gheorghe Dinică. interesting presence - Dan Puric. but each of them is only promise. it is a strange film. not an adaptation. only a kind of diary. not bad but in many scenes - boring. drops, slices, shadows of feelings. and a figure of a prince far from time and people. an inhuman prince. crumbs from Felix and Otilia . fall of an universe and last gesture of a version for king Lear. and conclusion - Sergiu Nicolaescu was not an actor. only hanger. for its characters.
  • this movie is extraordinary! i have seen it just once but it remained in my mind as the best Romanian movie i have ever seen.everything is great:the story, based on the novel "Printul", by Tudor Teodorescu-Braniste, which is very strange and attractive at the same time;the landscaping;the music;the idea that makes Sergiu Nicolaescu once again a great director.The actors are playing just perfect.You can see great actors with small roles , but they play just great and they make the movie more interesting.The places chosen for the movie are outstanding.the castle, the sea side, Paris...the train rail....even the train itself!The end of the movie it's very sad, it made me want to read the novel!