Add a Review

  • nogodnomasters14 August 2017
    Warning: Spoilers
    The film is listed as "Comedy, Horror, Mystery" at IMDb but fails to excel in any category.

    When James Erickson's (Armin Habibovich) mother dies, she leaves behind a cardboard box with newspaper clippings, journals, etc. The bulk of the film consists of James going through the box and we see the items he reads as badly made film flashbacks. James has inherited some land that has a curse. People die who go on the land.

    I can see the comedy aspect, although I don't know how much was intentional. The character of Jacob (Alex Cotant) as an elderly man was intentional. The beast living in the wilds of Solitude, North Dakota...all 95 acres of sacred land was a joke maybe? An expedition to look for a plant in the winter time? Finding a plant that immediately heals wounds, and then never using it in the plot again? Finding an arrowhead "on the ground" on top of snow? The acting was very sad, apparently some by design. I didn't find it very entertaining, except for Jacob.

    Guide: F-word, sex, no nudity Winner of the 2014 Audience Award Twin Cities Film Fest...most likely because it makes fun of people in a border state.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    UK title - Beast of Prey. I bought this thinking that it was going to be a werewolf movie, but instead it is about some 400 year old creature that looks like it's made of wood. Which is quite apt as most of the cast are completely wooden, the acting is so bad that it is painful to watch. In addition the film, for the first hour at least, is extremely boring and dull. There is gore in the last half hour, plus one jump scene, saving it from me scoring this 1/10, but under any title this movie is a stinker!
  • dcarsonhagy4 January 2017
    Warning: Spoilers
    They sure can make a movie sound way better than it actually is, huh? Such is the case for this stinker.

    The story is about some fellow who inherits a big old mess. Seems his long-dead relatives lived on a cursed land (where a hairy arm complete with big fingernails) lives and has promised to wreak havoc until...KMart has 24/7 blue light specials.

    Cheaply done, horribly written, terribly acted, and lasting about 50 minutes too long (the movie actually clocks in at 89 minutes, but, you get my drift), this is just plain awful. I was put off in the first two minutes when the "hero" did nothing but whine and cry, as most heroes do, but I digress. He is then "off to see the wizard," but only encounters Squaw Ugly-Mug, who looks constipated throughout the movie. Honestly, this one is SO bad, it could become a cult favorite.

    Rated "R" for bad acting, the poorest special effects, and one constipated squaw, stay the hell away from this one.
  • If you're watching this looking for a good scary movie you will be severely disappointed. The acting is horrendous, the story is non existent and the filming quality is on a whole new level of terrible. Much of the film is in black and white for no good reason. I lasted approximately 10 minutes before I couldn't handle it anymore. I honestly can't recall ever watching anything this bad and that's no exaggeration. How this garbage ever got produced is a mystery to me. Stay far away from this one as it has no redeeming qualities whatsoever and your money is better flushed down the toilet. If anything ever deserved a rating of 0 it's this one.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The story is non too original - back in the 1930's a plot of land in a forest is purchased and when the owners visit with the intention of carrying out scientific research they are met by a native American woman who declares the site to be a sacred place and tries to warn them off. Naturally they decline and are summarily dispatched one by one by a mysterious beast. The first 45 minutes or so of the film recounts how a similar scenario is played out every decade or so right up to the present day. So now it's time for our contemporary heroes to follow the well trodden path of their forebears, but this is where the film for me scores an own goal. Up until this point the film makers had done quite a good job of creating an atmosphere of supernatural menace. The 'creature' was never seen and the victims were generally killed instantly - one of the characters in one of the flashbacks remarks how speedy and powerful it is - supernaturally so. But now, just as the native woman is delivering her spiel "you shouldn't have come here" , who ambles along but your friendly local (obviously man in a monster suit) entity. Along the way, it is revealed that the woman conjured up the monster about 400 years ago to protect the site, which they have faithfully been patrolling ever since. Throughout the film you have been left in no doubt that by the time you catch sight of the beast, you are already dead. But now, for some inexplicable reason, the beast just stands around next to the woman, as if posing for a holiday photograph. Eventually, one of our heroes shoots it (with a gun, not a camera). 'You can't kill it' scoffs the woman, presumably because it is one of the 'undead' so in a flash of inspiration the gunfire is turned on the woman, apparently killing her (although at 400 years old presumably she was 'undead' too?) and causing the beast to dissolve into the ether. A note about the retrospective clips - I read in a review elsewhere that the seemingly bad acting (especially in the first clip) was an attempt to capture the style of the period in question. In fact, each of the clips is quite carefully crafted to evoke the style of the time period they represent. As I mentioned earlier, the bulk of the film is quite well done, so why oh why did they ruin it with such a ridiculous ending?
  • Warning: Spoilers
    ... bad. Really, really, REALLY BAD. The story revolves around our hero's attempt to find out what sort of mysterious creature that it is haunting the woods around a small town.

    During a portion of the movie, there is a "reenactment" of past events, shown in black and white. In this reenactment of past events, a group of scientists are camping in the woods searching for a substance with miraculous healing powers. Now, even though the scientists are camping in old-fashioned canvas tents, out-of-doors, they're dressed in business suits, shirts and ties, overcoats, and wingtips. This is supposed to be many years in the past, and at least one of the scientists is wearing modern clothes and glasses, and has a modern haircut. Oh, and it is the dead of winter. Everyone knows that you rough it in the woods wearing Wall Street attire in the dead of winter.

    While our nattily attired scientists are trying to find this mystery substance, they are warned to move away by what is supposed to be a Native American Woman. Great casting there. She looked like someone went to the local Denny's and hired the first woman that they found there with dark hair and features. Of course, our stalwart scientists don't listen, and they are killed one by one by a mysterious creature. At one point, the creature is in one of the tents attacking someone, and one of the scientists shoots at it. It is truly as astounding gun, either that, or the scientist firing it is the worst shot in the history of the cinema. He is shooting at the creature, though the side of the tent, from eight to ten feet away. He empties the revolver, which looks like it was bought from the $.99 clearance bin at Toys 'R' Us, but there are no holes punched into the side of the tent, where the shooter was aiming... from eight feet away.

    Oh, and our creature! Go to a local nail salon, and take photographs of the worst case of toenail fungus that you can find. Develop the photographs, then tear them up and glue them to a Playtex dishwashing glove. There's your monster's hand and claws.

    Later in the movie, many years later, the same Denny's waitress Native American woman who tried to warn off the scientists shows up to warm off one of their sons, who somehow inherited this land. She looks exactly the same way that she did decades before. She literally did not appear to have aged so much as a single day in 30 or so years. No wrinkles, no strands of gray accumulated in three decades.

    How can I put this as delicately as possible, bearing in mind the stellar quality of this film. Ah. I've had contentious, abrasive, difficult bowel movements that were more enjoyable.. and better made... than this film.

    Avoid "American Beast" at all costs.