User Reviews (99)

Add a Review

  • This is in my 50 best movies of all time list.

    Rod Steiger,a gifted actor, is at his very best here portraying Sol Nazerman, a pawnbroker who is completely shut down emotionally.

    Through flashbacks, some fast, mostly slow, we see both the joy and subsequent horror of Sol's life in Nazi Germany, when his wife and children are swept into the camps and killed. Sol's deepest pain is that he survived and he carries it visibly. Nothing touches him. He is removed from humanity, living a life outside anyone else's.

    This is never more exemplified than at his shop, where he is behind bars, often in shadow, while humanity moves outside, sometimes pleading with him, sometimes just wishing to make an emotional contact to no avail.

    Brilliant black and white photography. Quincy Jones' music underscores this, it is jazzy 60s type of music, loud and vibrant, totally contrasting with the dark, dead world of Sol.

    The supporting cast are terrific and the outdoor location shooting in New York is riveting. The movement of street life against the heaviness of Sol's plodding.

    I still find it hard to believe that Rod lost the Oscar to Lee Marvin in the forgettable "Cat Ballou" (!!) that year.

    This has to be seen by any serious lovers of movies. The last scene, done in one continuous take is heartbreaking, Sol finally getting in touch with the pain he has buried so deeply. Gut wrenching stuff. 9 out of 10.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Rod Steiger considered this his best performance and he might be right. He is, for him, subdued for most of the film, although towards the end he punctuates his performance with silent screams. He's pretty good as the survivor of Auschwitz, consumed by survivor guilt, and denying himself any pleasures except the money taken in his pawn shop.

    Various figures come and go in his life, although he shows no particular interest in any of them, and aversion towards many. The characters are rather sketchily done, as they might be in a play. There is the ambitious assistant, the whore, the gangster, the lonely man who wants to talk about Herbert Spencer, Reni Santoni as a quivering junkie, the pregnant young girl who wants to sell her engagement ring. (Not a wedding ring, mind you, this is an illegitimate pregnancy and in 1964 you were still in trouble if you had no husband and no opportunity for an abortion.) "That diamond is glass," he tells the stricken girl brusquely. Steiger's Sol Nazerman is a pretty cold fish.

    His relationship with his Latino assistant is key to Steiger's evolution. Steiger "teaches" him that nothing matters but money, so Ortiz very sensibly decides to help the local gangsters hold up Nazerman's shop. But the assistant, instead, teaches Nazerman something. Killed in the robbery, he teaches Nazerman to feel pain, which Nazerman then reaffirms by impaling his palm on one of those spikey receipt holders, a kind of stigma to go along with his concentration camp tattoos.

    The movie was pretty much a shocker on its release. Partly because the audience got to see some naked breasts. Amusing now, isn't it? It was also knocked because of the way Latinos and blacks were treated. I don't know why. It would be surprising if the owner of a pawn shop on 116th street didn't have a lot of customers who were people of color -- good and bad.

    The jazz score is loud and at times almost overwhelming. The photography makes 1964 New York grimy, smoggy, and dangerous.

    If you haven't seen it, catch it if you have the chance. You're not likely to forget it in a hurry.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    In a poor neighborhood of New York, the bitter and lonely Jewish pawnbroker Sol Nazerman (Rod Steiger) is a survivor from Auschwitz that has no emotions or feelings. Sol lost his dearest family and friends in the war and the faith on God and the belief in mankind. Now he only cares for money and is haunted by daydreams, actually flashbacks from the period of the concentration camp.

    Sol's assistant is the ambitious Latin Jesus Ortiz (Jaime Sanchez), a former urchin that has regenerated and now wants to learn with Sol how to run a business of his own. When Sol realizes that the obscure laundry business he has with the powerful gangster Rodriguez (Brock Peters) comes also from brothels, Sol recalls the fate of his beloved wife in the concentration camp and has a nervous breakdown. His attitude leads Jesus Ortiz to a tragedy and Sol finds a way to cry.

    "The Pawnbroker" is a powerful and realistic story of bitterness, loneliness and disbelief in mankind of a man victim of the Holocaust. Rod Steiger has certainly the best performance of his career in the complex role of a skeptical and bitter Jewish. His assistant is an ambiguous character that contrasts with the pawnbroker with his optimistic and happy behavior. In the end, the pawnbroker feels the need to cry and impales his hand with a spike, also in a reference of Jesus Christ. My vote is eight.

    Title (Brazil): "O Homem do Prego" ("The Man of the Spike" - literally; however, it is a pun that also means "The Pawnbroker")
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This movie gets under your skin. The story, the acting, the black and white fotography and Quincy Jones' soundtrack make this a very memorable experience.

    Occasionally we are made to believe that victims of atrocious crimes are "good people". While it is true that they have suffered greatly and those who never did owe them sympathy, it is just not logical to conclude that victims have acquired "goodness" solely by being victims surviving their ordeal. The Pawnbroker deals with the fate of such a survivor. It does it in a way that is unique: The victim becomes a real, three dimensional person - a great performance by Rod Steiger - and the victim has a normal everyday "life after" that grinds on and on.

    You feel sorry for pawnbroker Sol Nazerman, because you know that he has been through hell, that his family was annihilated, that he was humiliated beyond endurance in the most sadistic way. At the same time you have to admit that Sol Nazerman is not a very pleasant character. Is it the result of his terrible experiences that he is that way? The movie says as much, but does it really matter? Nazerman functions as an independent, tax paying citizen, and he is trapped within himself. He is slowly despairing behind the bars of his pawnshop counter. He is full of bitterness and self hate and meets material and emotional requests from others with sharp sarcasm.

    What makes the story and the film really great is the way it shows Nazerman's inability to communicate within his surroundings. In the depiction of Nazerman as a misfit the movie goes beyond the specific historical and geographical circumstances – and in giving the social misfit a face and a voice lies the brilliance of all of Rod Steiger‘s best performances.

    POSSIBLE SPOILER AHEAD

    The pawnbroker has a helper who is the person closest to him. Jesus, a cheerful, somewhat naive youth from the neighbourhood, is very eager to learn business from Nazerman. He is full of hope and convinced that by finding out his boss's "secrets" he could get on the way to prosperity. Nazerman at times shows a glimpse of love or even fatherly feelings for Jesus. For me the climax of the film is when Jesus asks his boss casually about "his people". Nazerman starts telling Jesus in a brilliantly phrased, sermon-like summary of the four thousand years of Jewish suffering. The miserable pawnbroker gets heated up, his voice and his anger rise. Jesus writhes uncomfortably. When it's over Jesus gulps and says: "You are some guy" – and the episode is over. It shows with much clarity - and this really impressed me very much - that Nazerman was not aware that he expressed himself in a way that a kid with the background of Jesus could not possibly understand what he meant to tell him. This unawareness of the pawnbroker will at the end of the movie cost Jesus‘ life. Nazerman then "comes to his senses" and squarely blames himself for the tragedy. The end of the movie is really too cruel to bear.
  • Rod Steiger gives the greatest lead-actor performance I have ever seen in the title role of the Pawnbroker. Lumet's direction strikes no false note and neither does the incredibly well-researched and painfully honest script. It's hard to believe how virtually forgotten this true masterpiece of a survivor's private hell. It shows very vividly that even those of us lucky enough to survive the camps need to be ever more rare of spirit to survive without significant trauma scars. Steiger extracts every piece of emotion from his character with a performance that exceeds all that came before it and has never been surpassed. Every aspiring actor needs to view Steiger's performance to realize how magnificent it truly is.
  • nl1108723 January 2005
    A classic. One of the few if not only who portrays not the atrocity at the surface, but the trauma afterward. No evil SSers in their black uniforms of death. It might have been more entertaining and simple to understand. Instead the movie captures the evil in the victim. There are the walking dead. Those who survived. For them living was nothing but survival. The setting is NYC of the 60s. This movie will outlive most movies. It is a true classic in the psychological genre. The only minor flaw is the clownesque character of Jesus. Rod Steiger puts down an excelling performance as the character of the pawnbroker. A very esthetic filming in black and white.
  • Harlem pawnbroker Sol Nazerman wants to be left alone. A death camp survivor whose wife and children did not get out he has withdrawn from the world as much as possible in order to cope. The down and out people that frequent his shop get little more than his standard offer. There is no small talk, haggling or eye contact. Take it or leave it. Jesus, his ambitious assistant is treated with the same attitude except when Sol decides to impart some brutal life lessons on what it is to be a "merchant." Grim as his existence is Nazerman seems content to let his life slip away without the pain of feeling anything. This all changes when it's revealed he's running a front for a Harlem crime boss to launder cash. Forced to confront his involvement in criminal activity and constantly reminded of his concentration camp past Nazerman descends even deeper into his own private hell.

    From start to finish The Pawnbroker is one tragic journey. Save for the optimistic Jesus the film is populated with characters in various forms of desperation. Rod Stieger as Nazerman is at times almost too painful to watch as he slips in and out of catatonia between the callous and cold diatribes he serves up to those attempting to reach out to him. Jaime Sanchez as Jesus is a bit too strident and Geraldine Fitzgerald's out of her depth social worker too clueless but Brock Peter's stylish thug is a potent dose of reality and highly effective.

    Director Sidney Lumet's direction lapses into heavy handedness (slo mo, overlong flashbacks) on occasion bogging the film down while at other times "nouvelle vague" technique produces some powerfully edited scenes. Boris Kauffman's smoky cinematography successfully establishes mood and place stealing shots on Harlem streets and imprisoning Nazerman within the maze of cages in his shop and Quincy Jones quirky score partners nicely with the action and setting.

    The Pawnbroker can be a difficult film to get through since the suffering remains unrelenting and Lumet's pacing is erratic most of the way but Stieger's towering performance makes it well worth the ordeal.
  • sol-kay23 January 2005
    Warning: Spoilers
    **SPOILERS** Owning a pawnshop in Manhattan's Spanish Harlem Sol Nazerman, Rod Stiger,tries to cut himself off from any human feelings that he still has left by buying and selling the hopes and dreams, for a few dollars on the buy side and five to ten times as much on the sell side, of the people of the neighborhood that he does business with.

    Sol's hopes and dreams were destroyed some twenty five years ago in German occupied Poland. It's there where he lost his entire family in the Nazi concentration camps. As the 25th anniversary of that nightmare approaches Sol starts to get flooded with shocking flashbacks of what happened to him his wife and two children back then and goes as far as trying to stop the clock,or calender, to keep that dreadful anniversary from coming.

    Sol's past WWII nightmare in Poland becomes a real and new nightmare now in the New York City of 1964 that meshes together and in the end shocks him back to the reality of being a person with feelings for others as well as himself.

    Sol's helper at the pawnshop Jesus Ortiz, Jamie Sanchez, sees a man give Sol an envelop with some $5,000.00 in cash that Sol puts away in his safe. Ortiz thinking that thats the kind of money to be made running a pawnshop wants Sol to tell him all he knows about the business so that he could go into the pawn business himself. What Ortiz didn't realize was that the man who gave Sol the money was Saverese, Warren Finnerty, a bag man for the top crime boss in Harlem Rodriguez ,Brock Peters, who's using Sol's pawnshop to launder his dirty and ill gotten gains.

    This set the stage for Ortiz to get involved in a robbery of Sol's store with three of his friends in the neighborhood Tangee Buck & Robinson, Raymond St. Jacques John McCurry & Charles Dierkop. In the end the robbery would result in Ortiz's death and Sol's regaining his humanity by getting his feelings for his fellow man, and woman, as well as himself back but at a shocking and heart crunching cost.

    Undoubtedly Rod Stigers best movie performance as concentration camp survivor Sol Nazerman who after trying to suppress his feelings for years has them burst open like a long inactive volcano at the end of the movie.

    The movie "The Pawnbroker" covers the days that lead up to Sol's finding out that keeping deep inside all the hurt and suffering from the past will only make him and those around him only more depressed and not allow those wounds of past years to heal. Sol's sees later in the movie how his actions hurt people that tried to be friendly and help him like his new neighbor Marilyn Brichfield, Geraldine Fitzgerald, who tried to strike up a friendship with him. Marilyn was a lonely middle-aged women who lost her husband at an early age.

    Sol's most hurtful act was that what he did to his second wife Tessie ,Marketa Kimberell, who's also a concentration camp survivor. After Tessie called him at the pawnshop with the news that her father Mendel, Baruch Lumet, just passed away Sol coldly told her to bury him and hung up.

    Sol's relations with Rodiguez was also a bit odd. How could he have not known that Rodriguez owned the whorehouse down the block from his pawnshop when he confronted him at his penthouse about the dirty dealings that he was doing in the neighborhood? Since we know that Sol himself was involved with them by laundering Rodiguez's dirty money and taking a cut for himself all these years?

    "The Pawnbroker" is a dark haunting and surrealistic film that hits all the right buttons in it's story about the human condition thats so skillfully played by it's leading actor Rod Stiger. A story of the loneliness and emptiness of the human heart which can only go on for so long until, like in the movie, it either breaks down or bursts open and explodes from the pressure thats been built up in it over the years.
  • I have mixed feelings about this film. On the one hand, I admire the way the director, Sidney Lumet, and the editor, Ralph Rosenblum are willing to take chances and challenge us through an unorthodox editing style that reflects the main character's state of mind more than it serves to move the plot along. It should come to no surprise after seeing this film that Lumet came from a theater tradition where he worked for many years as an stage actor and director. His best films are character-driven, and Lumet has a unique ability to get the very best performances out of his actors. The Pawnbroker is as much Lumet's film as it is Rod Steiger's. This is the best performance of a very distinguished career.

    That being said, the pacing is slow and some of the plot elements aren't made very clear (such as the money laundering scheme). With the exception of Sol and Jesus's relationship, the rest of the relationships in the film are handled a little sloppily. Despite the incredible and convincing performances, it is sometimes difficult to know exactly what each character expects from one another. There really isn't a goal that drives the plot forward, but that's not necessarily a weakness of the film. Lastly, this is a bleak film; one of the saddest and most hopeless I have ever seen. I would have liked to see a glimmer of light at the end of the tunnel, but perhaps there can be no "happy ending" for people like Sol Nazerman.
  • Although the supporting cast is uniformly excellent (Brock Peters especially so), they are really only believable props to what is, essentially, a one-man performance by Rod Steiger.

    And what a performance it is! Steiger grabs your emotions, and maintains a hold long after the final credits roll. He sucks all the oxygen out of the room, and you're not able to draw a deep breath until it's over.

    For some reason, this movie seems to have faded from public awareness, and isn't all that easy to find. I first saw it in 1965, and then again about 30 years later; it packed the same emotional wallop the second time around.

    Both Steiger and director Sidney Lumet have done plenty of excellent work since The Pawnbroker, but this remains the highwater mark for both.

    It is, unquestionably, one of the most powerful films ever made, and that's a might tough act to follow.
  • The career of Rod Steiger can be used as a warning that quantity is inferior to quality . He might have appeared in ON THE WATERFRONT , DR ZHIVAGO , and THE SERGEANT but he also appeared in some awful crap like THE AMITYVILLE HORROR , THE KINDRED , MODERN VAMPIRES and THE LAST PRODUCER . In fact the only other actor I can think of who has a similar shocking inconsistency of roles is Robert DeNiro , and neither actor can use money as an excuse for appearing in so many turkeys since their worst roles happened at the end of their careers

    I would rate THE PAWNBROKER as Steiger's best all time performance . He might have won the Oscar for best actor for IN THE HEAT OF THE NIGHT but we see the zenith of his career in this film . Steiger is Sol Nazerman , holocaust survivor now running a pawnbroker shop in New York City amongst a lot of seedy untrustworthy characters . Jews are history's great survivors but because of the rest of humanity's inhumanity towards the Jew it seems to have left scars on their psyche - Very suspicious by nature and with a not very friendly mannerism Steiger captures this survivors persona perfectly . There's little to add to this . Method acting at its most perfect

    If there's a problem with the film it's that it doesn't seem very cinematic . It could be the original novel by Edward Lewis Wallant , or it could be the way the novel is adapted to screen , or it could be to do with director Sidney Lumet . Looking at Lumet's resume I'm struck at how much of the director's work is based on stage plays : 12 ANGRY MEN , THE HILL , THE OFFENCE , this movie isn't but it certainly feels like it was culled from the theatre with its limited set of ( Interior ) locations and the use of close up shots of characters faces . It's not much of a problem since it emphasises the performances and I can't repeat enough how good Rod Steiger is , but the directing isn't as superb as Lumet's earlier 12 ANGRY MEN
  • It's strange to say that this very grim movie is one of my all-time favorites. "The Pawnbroker" might make you suicidal in it's deep cynicism of the human condition, but I think there is a positive side to the film. The main character, a deeply-wounded Holocaust survivor, initial has no feelings for anyone or anything--he's just going through the motions of life. But by the end of the film he learns that people are not all bad--and maybe that's the most shocking revelation of them all!

    Certainly Rod Steiger's greatest role. Do see it.
  • Pauline Kael hated this movie. She called it "bad" and "terrible." Leonard Maltin gave it 4 stars, called it "important" and The New York Times also raved calling it "remarkable" and "brilliant." My opinion lies somewhere between. I don't think the movie really works. It's confusing, although I think the confusion is meant to be sort of impressionistic. There are some embarrassing moments and it is sometimes a tad arty. Ideas are suggested and not always clarified. Nevertheless, it's worth seeing. I live in Manhattan, where most of the movie was shot. I think anyone who lives in Manhattan will be entertained (the subway scene, the sequence filmed at Lincoln Square, a shot of Avery Fisher Hall, Nina Simone and Flip Wilson's names on the marquee at the Apollo) but it also makes New York and its environs seem like a depressing, claustrophobic hell. (I wish it still seemed that way to the tourists and yuppies that flock here.)

    The main reason for seeing the movie, aside from the urban atmosphere, is the actors. Steiger is sometimes too intense, bordering on self-parody. But it's still a fascinating performance. All the other actors are equally fine. Kael and Crowther in The New York Times went out of their way to praise an actor they both called "old Juano Hernandez." He is heart-breaking.

    The nudity must have been shocking at the time. There is an implication of evil homosexuality in the Brock Peters character. I must check Vito Russo's book "The Celluloid Closet" to see if he picked up on it.

    Recommended!
  • Rod Steiger doesn't so much give a great actor's performance in "The Pawnbroker" as much as he presents a seminar on film about great acting. He spits out his lines, contorts his face and becomes mired in bitter, embattled rage. We get few other dimensions from Steiger and, even at the picture's close, I felt little about his character's progression because the actor himself is still teaching class. As a Concentration Camp survivor immigrated to New York City, Steiger cannot do anything simple: his pain is grandiose, unsubtle. As for the plot, everything is spelled out for us to read, and director Sidney Lumet refuses to let the audience do any additional work. The look of the picture is edgy (pushing the boundaries of cinema in '64 with a gritty scenario), but the rest is flattened out, made too easy. The flashbacks are well-done (especially a haunting shot involving rings on the prisoners' fingers), but Quincy Jones' music is too jazzy (particularly at the end) and the dialogue, courtesy screenwriters Morton Fine and David Friedkin, is too direct and forceful. Eventually, the film is simply off-putting. ** from ****
  • Powerful drama centering around elderly NYC slum-area pawnbroker (Rod Steiger in Oscar nominated performance), tormented by his painful memories of Nazi concentration camp nightmare. Embittered, he brushes off all friendly people in his life, insisting that nothing matters and emotions are wasted.

    Apparently "playing the system" for years, allowing king-pin thugs to use his store as a money laundering "front", while collecting his "cut", the no-nonsense pawnbroker is suddenly plagued by flashbacks, showing how his young wife and son are killed, and at once wanting to stop the evil workings of his hoodloom infested slum neighborhood. When the young "apprentice" he hired lays his own life on the line to protect him from being shot during a robbery, the pawnbroker shows his first human emotions since the horrific day he lost his family.

    The flawless direction, masterful black & white cinematography, haunting Jazz score, along with innovative handling of the themes (racism, prostitution, social reforms, etc.), make this nothing less than a masterpiece. There is a sequence with prolonged nudity, considered daring during the "Hayes Code" years, even if it appears tame by today's standards. The scenes are not gratuitous, but essential to the plot. Still these scenes may make this film unsuitable for pre-teens.

    Like Shindler's List, this is a film many may find painful to watch. By 1965 standards, the mere attempt of giving insight into the evils of the Holocaust was a strong move. The resulting product withstood the test of time and will endure. Named as his personal favorite work, "The Pawnbroker" gives us Rod Steiger's finest performance! Highly recommended.
  • A very impressive and dramatic movie. I remember when I saw the first time this movie as a young teenager, I was deeply impressed by it, and after many years it still one of the movie that are important to me. The thing that hit me in the movie is the wire between the violence in the streets of the city and the violence in the Nazist concentration camp. It's the story without any hope of a survivor, a dead man walking, living an impossible life in the violent modern society. It has been the first movie that I saw about other movies about the Holocaust and still Ithink it's one of the more impressive about this argument. I saw many movies about the Holocaust, ma no one treats as this, the difficult life of survivors who lost their family.
  • The Pawnbroker is maybe the best of Sidney Lumet's New York based films. It tells the story of Sol Nazerman, former professor from Germany, Holocaust survivor, now making a living as a pawnbroker in Harlem. Rod Steiger got an Oscar nomination for Best Actor. If he had lost to Sir Laurence Olivier for Othello I might understand, but losing to Lee Marvin for Cat Ballou? All three are performances on different planes of acting.

    This is one of those films like Cyrano De Bergerac which rise and fall on the ability of the person performing the title character. With a minimum of dialog and a performance mostly of anguished expressions, Rod Steiger conveys the story of a man who's really seen the worst of what life has to offer and expects very little from humanity. And in Harlem no one rises among the dregs of society that usually come peddling the last of their dreams to him.

    This film was done in 1964 and that was also the year of the Harlem riots, sparked by an NYPD officer killing a black teenager. My guess is that Sol Nazerman's pawn shop, white owned that it was never saw a scrap of damage. That's because one of the reasons he stays in business is because of a little money laundering on the side for Harlem racketeer Brock Peters.

    Unfortunately Steiger's assistant Jaime Sanchez sees a huge amount of cash being deposited in the safe after office hours. He's an ambitious young man and not really deciding which side of the fence to fall on. It's more his indecision that leads to tragedy later on.

    The highlight of the film for me is Steiger's equivalent of a 'hath a Jew not eyes' speech when he explains to Sanchez just why the Jewish people have the 'mercantile heritage' as he puts it. Too often it's forgotten that in all the places for thousands of years where Jews couldn't own land, this was what was left to them. On a side note that's one of the reasons for the State of Israel developing its own collective agricultural institution, the Kibbutz. It was to get Jews deliberate in touch with the land, to grow things on it and develop an attachment to it.

    Some of the other cast members of note are Geraldine Fitzgerald as a neighborhood settlement house social worker who tries to penetrate Steiger's catatonic personality and a really wonderful bit by Reni Santoni as a junkie trying to pawn a radio and jonesing to beat the band.

    Still the film is Rod Steiger's show, one of the few times he carried a film by himself and he does it magnificently.
  • Rod Steiger gives the best performance of his career, even better than his Oscar winning performance in 'In The Heat Of The Night'. He plays an elderly Harlem pawnshop owner that mostly thru the use of flashbacks, we find out survived a concentration camp, but lost everyone he cared about. Going thru those horrors have made him bitter, angry, distant. His experiences do not give him empathy for the suffering of others, such as his customers. Instead he despises them. When he finally lets loose nearly 30 years of built up emotion, Steiger goes from fear, to compassion, to anger, to guilt and to rage so quickly and so seamlessly he should have won the Oscar for finale alone. Sidney Lumet directs brilliantly, from extended scenes in the pawnshop, to the gritty streets of New York, to the flashbacks of the incredible horrors of the holocaust. But aside from Steiger and Lumet, the rest of the film is a mess. Quincy Jones jazz score with upbeat tempo at downbeat times seems out of place, and in fact quite jarring at times. The rest of the cast give performances too over the top to mesh well with Steiger or the material, especially Jaime Sanchez as the pawnshop assistant. Geraldine Fitzgerald's character really provides nothing to the story. She exists just to show us just how out of touch with the rest of the human race the pawnbroker is. But we already get plenty of that from his interactions with his family, customers and assistant. The screenplay was good as a singular character study of this man, but some of the dialog was horrible. Apparently in 1965 New York everyone and anyone who spoke to an elderly man called him 'uncle'. And they keep saying it. Everyone who comes into the pawnshop or runs into him on the street calls him uncle. Nobody calls him man, dude, old timer, sir, mister. It gives you the feeling that the dialog was written by somebody trying to sound hip and up with the times but without any idea of how to do it, someone unfamiliar with the street slang of the day. But in the end I still recommend seeing it, especially if you are a fan of a great performance.
  • This has to be the most depressing film I have ever seen. I seriously stopped in the middle because I was getting so bummed out.

    Rod Steiger as Sol Nazerman, the pawnbroker of the title is brilliant in the role. I doubt if there is anyone else who could have brought froth the depths of despair that Nazerman was experiencing. He lost everything, not just a family, but his who reason for living, and, as he says, there was nothing he could do about it. He was utterly helpless as his world crumbled.

    He was a man without compassion or felling. His only comfort was money, and that really did him no good. It did not help him when he was reliving the flashbacks from the Holocaust. All he wanted to do was die, but apparently did not have the will to do it himself, so he set himself up for killing.

    Steiger wasn't the only person that made this film worth watching. There was Brock Peters as a gangster, Thelma Oliver as the girlfriend of his assistant (Jaime Sánchez), and Sánchez himself.

    The gritty and dark setting was perfect for the film. Sidney Lumet was excellent as the director.
  • kairingler11 July 2013
    Rod Steiger delivers the performance of a lifetime in this sad movie. the story is about a man who lives in New York runs a laundry mat,, and starts having flashbacks of the War when he was in the Concentration Camps. the story has some flashbacks, and they are very poignant. the old man takes on a younger partner in the Laundromat,, but later on Sol finds out that the money used to run the business also comes from a brothel.. there's not a lot of action in this,, but it doesn't need to have action,, this movie is based on pure raw emotion,, hatred, greed, and all of the things incorporated in a great drama. it's sad to see the detioration of Sol as the movie winds along. this is a very powerful and shocking movie, not to be watched by the lighthearted, i'm German so i will definitely watch this again.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I've been haunted by THE PAWNBROKER for almost a month now. If you've perused the reviews on here, it's clear no one finds this an easy film to watch and not only because it deals with an existentially lonely man still traumatized by losing everything he ever loved in the Holocaust (though that is no small part of it).

    No, unlike a lot of other Hollywood films, Rod Steiger's Sol Nazerman, traumatized and pitiable though he may be, is not a nice man. He views all other people as scum, whether they're young thugs out for money or similarly lonely souls expecting only so much as a brief conversation to alleviate their pain. He treats his second wife, herself a victim of the Holocaust who has lost loved ones, with a coldness that borders on contempt. He claims to have no bitterness or anger about what happened to him, but in every scene, there's the sense that this man is shouldering unimaginable pain and hatred. It's so real, raw, and hard to watch, especially because Nazerman hurts others constantly. However, one cannot condemn him once his flashbacks to life in the concentration camps become more prominent, revealing the roots of his trauma. Like few other character dramas, you wonder if you wouldn't be any different from Nazerman if you too lost your family, your job, your dignity. In this way, Nazerman is truly a three-dimensional character, not the saintly victim a lesser movie might portray him to be.

    Nazerman has more than a few things in common with Travis Bickle from TAXI DRIVER. Both men are traumatized, angry, and alienated. Both men choose to languish in seedy settings, inhabiting places that reflect and validate their vision of the world as loveless, immoral, and contemptuous. They pretend to be above the lowlives and criminals around them while each is, in his own way, complicit in the crime around them if only by turning a blind eye (Nazerman's store is a front for a local racketeer played with cool, sleazy brilliance by Brock Peters, and Nazerman only objects once he learns Peters is involved in prostitution since Nazerman was forced to watch his wife be repeatedly raped in a Nazi brothel).

    Of course, the endings of THE PAWNBROKER and TAXI DRIVER are quite different, even though both end on an ambiguous note for the protagonist. I am still reeling from the former. Does Nazerman overcome his alienation from society? I don't know... will the tragedy of Jesus' murder save Nazerman from his isolation or will he only burrow further into himself?

    I'm aware this was more a mess of thoughts than a review. I'm still trying to process it all. And I think that's part of what makes this movie great.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    We open upon an emotionally detached Sol Nazerman, an aging Jewish former professor who survived the concentration camps but lost his wife, children and seemingly his humanity.

    Sol now operates a pawnshop in Harlem views the people that frequent his shop with disdain not because of race he say's but because they are scum. Despite this, people still try to connect with. The middle aged widow (Geraldine Fitzgerald) raising funds for the youth center, Jesus Ortiz his young shop assistant and an elderly man who wants to talk with someone about books and ideas. Even the local crime boss (Brock Peters) who uses the pawnshop to launder money wants to connect with Sol.

    Rod Steiger despite his appearance in the movie was incredibly only 39 at the time the film was made. For his role Steiger would be nominated for his second Academy Award, his first had been for Supporting Actor in "On the Waterfront". Three years later he would win the Oscar for the film "In the Heat of the Night" a role which was again very different from either of his two previous nominations.

    While this is amongst Steiger's best work I do not believe this was amongst Director Sidney Lumet's (12Angry Men, Dog Day Afternoon) best. There are certainly some very powerful scenes particularly inside the pawnshop, and of course there is Steiger's wonderful performance, but some other aspects fall short. In particular there are some scenes that don't seem necessary to the central plot and while initially the flashbacks are powerful there effect decreases through overuse.

    Some of the limitations in the film might also be the result of the script, while the central story and central character are fascinating some of the other aspects and characters seem to be more hastily sketched and even clichéd.

    The film also features a wonderful dynamic score by music legend Quincy Jones. This score would be something of a breakthrough and Jones first of 33 major Hollywood scores.
  • Oooph, this movie hurts.

    Film buffs can find evidence of schizophrenia in any movie decade, but perhaps none more so than in the 1950s and 1960s. It is nearly inconceivable to me that "The Pawnbroker" came out in the year that "The Sound of Music" won the Best Picture Academy Award. Don't get me wrong, I very much like "The Sound of Music" too, but it almost seems like it was made in a different century compared to this film.

    Rod Steiger was justly nominated for and wrongly lost the Academy Award for his performance in "The Pawnbroker," as a concentration camp survivor who has lost all faith in humanity and sees people as no more or less valuable than the possessions they come to him to pawn. The film was directed by Sidney Lumet, and it creates the same sweaty, grimy atmosphere that Lumet would occasionally revisit (like in his 1975 film "Dog Day Afternoon") and that Martin Scorsese made a career of throughout the 1970s. It's a bleak film, one that uses the horrors of the Holocaust to shape its main character's psyche without giving him or the audience any real hope for his future. It's a film that suggests that the Holocaust broke something fundamental in human nature that will never be repaired. It's a message at odds with so many films that try to find closure or hope or at the very least a lesson to be learned from such a dark chapter of history, and it makes "The Pawnbroker" feel years ahead of its time.

    The film is also trailblazing in its acknowledgement of blacks and homosexuals at a time when the former were the subject of mostly preachy white guilt movies that starred Sidney Poitier and the latter were not to be found in films pretty much anywhere. In "The Pawnbroker," both exist without commentary; they're just part of the world Rod Steiger's character lives in, as disenfranchised from the rest of humanity in their own way as he is. It's rather remarkable that the film includes so many black and gay characters without the film being ABOUT black and gay characters. The casual inclusion of them is a greater statement for the time than a movie about them would have been.

    This is by no means a pleasant film to watch, but it is an awfully good one, and one that may very well leave you shaken.

    Grade: A
  • Warning: Spoilers
    "The Pawnbroker" stars Rod Steiger as a Holocaust survivor who becomes a pawnbroker in Spanish Harlem in the early-60's. This places the action 20 years out from WWII, roughly the same time that has passed since the first Desert Storm -- not a long time. It must have been even more powerful to see this harrowing film in the 1960's than it is today.

    Steiger has a sheer presence that makes minor quibbles, like his hard-to-place accent, inconsequential. The weight of experience is so heavy upon the main character, Mr. Nazerman, that he can only respond to people in the most perfunctory manner. All social niceties have left him. Thus when the pimp who is laundering money through Nazerman's pawnshop mockingly calls him "Professor", Nazerman simply hangs up the phone. Or when a junkie, trying to sell a gimcrack radio, berates him as a "filthy blood-sucking kike", he barely glances up as he replies "Still at the same address?". Seeing this disregard for social convention is a guilty pleasure, like watching Michael Imperioli of The Soproanos pull out a gun in order to get faster service in a donut shop. It brings you over to Nazerman's side, a dangerous place to be, because when the emotions do come out, they will be titanic.

    Lumet uses grids and latticework as a symbol of confinement throughout the film: the metal protective metal grid inside the pawnshop, often casting shadows on the characters, the fancy cross-hatched room divider in the pimp Rodriguez' pad, the railing on the patio of the social worker's apartment, the barbed wire in the flashbacks to the concentration camp. And who can blame Nazerman for staying within the lines? Ultimately though, Nazerman discovers that his business is being financed through prostitution, he flashes back to images of his wife (girlfriend?) in Nazi "Joy Division" sexual slavery, and he has a breakdown. The final scene is of Steiger plunging his hand through the sharp ticket-holder spine, then wandering the streets of Spanish Harlem, staring at his stigmata, shortly after his assistant has been killed in a botched robbery attempt.

    The power of Steiger's performance isn't in the shaking and grimacing though, it's in his non-reactivity. Being non-reactive is a high-status trait, and we find it intriguing that Nazerman, essentially a schlemiel who is at the behest of petty crooks, can carry himself with such authority. Perhaps we fellow schlemiels can model ourselves after him in some way.

    Yet there is an underlying tension of knowing that, in order to achieve this equanimity, he must essentially kill the parts of himself that are human, and this cannot last for long. How tempting it would be for an actor of lesser stature to give up on this theme, to instead portray the character as angry or simmering, and to try to force meaning into the dialog that Steiger wisely treats as throwaway. Steiger rejects poignancy and is a master of self-control. Thus when he breaks down it is all the more terrible.

    Minor notes and other gulity pleasures: Interiors are shot with that old klieg-light style that makes every character look like an escaped prisoner pinned against a prison drainpipe. The apartment furnishings inside Brock Peter's apartment are authentic Saarinen pedestal items (Saarinen claimed he wanted to provide a "solution for clearing up the slums of legs in US homes") and Eames chairs. Peter's manservant looks like a photographic negative of himself, instead of a black man in white clothing it's a white man with silver hair in black clothing, an early Andersen Cooper type.
  • The 1960s were many things – liberated, innovative, revolutionary, hip, bold, racy… but they were seldom sensitive, much less mature. And yet, being a time of greater honesty of expression, they were also a period in which humanity could perhaps begin to deal frankly with the most harrowing events of the century. But was the new generation of filmmakers up to the job? In some ways, yes they were. I am using the term filmmakers in its broadest sense, meaning everyone who contributes to the making of a motion picture. Lead actor Rod Steiger delivers a performance of incredible weight. It could be thought of as easy, portraying Sol Nazerman's emotional flatness, but in fact what Steiger is doing is portraying suppressed emotions, and he does so with exceptional control. Even when his character is at his most blank, Steiger is still presenting him as feeling on some level. This is testament to the commitment and realism of the Strasberg generation. But much as I admire Steiger, I would have preferred to see a man who actually petitioned hard for the role but never got it – Groucho Marx. At 74 Marx may have been a little old (although Steiger is theoretically too young), but I think he would have brought a certain level of feeling to the part, drawing from his life experience and the fact that comedians often have a contradictory knack for poignant dignity. This is something that a thorough professional like Steiger could not have achieved.

    The source novel by Edward Lewis Wallant appears to be an occasionally intelligent, respectful and even moving exploration of the effects of colossal emotional trauma. However it distractingly deals too much with the politics of the New York underbelly, and if there is some attempt to parallel the horrors of the holocaust with the deprivation of Harlem, this is an insulting piece of reductionism. From here on it is one poor judgment after another. The direction of Sidney Lumet, typically inventive but still a little unsteady at this point, veers off the rails completely here, with some unpleasantly bizarre and showy techniques. For example, when Brock Peters shows off his stolen-goods lawnmower, we can tell he is an intimidating character and that this is a confrontational moment – so why labour the point by putting the camera on the floor? Artsy self-indulgence is bad enough at the best of times, but it is monumentally inappropriate for a picture like this.

    And this is not all. The rambling Quincy Jones score relates not at all to the tone of the material (you couldn't even really say it is the sound of Harlem), and is surely only there because all independent avant-garde productions of the sixties "had" to have a free jazz score. And then there are the supporting roles – Jaime Sanchez's hammy Hispanic act would be fine in, say, West Side Story, but it's not for a serious picture. It's all such a shame because bits of The Pawnbroker are quite startlingly deep. There are certain things however that if done at all need to be done just right. I do not doubt that The Pawnbroker was all conceived with best of intentions, but those 60s hipsters were simply not equipped for the task.
An error has occured. Please try again.