User Reviews (47)

Add a Review

  • "Sting" injects some welcome thrills into the creature feature subgenre, but with a twist: the heart of the film lies not in the monstrous spider itself, but in the strained family dynamic at its core.

    We've seen plenty of arachnophobic nightmares come to life on screen before - "Arachnophobia" and "Eight Legged Freaks" come to mind. But "Sting" differentiates itself by focusing on Charlotte, a rebellious 12-year-old who finds solace in an unusual pet spider.

    As the heartwarming bond between Charlotte and "Sting" forms, the creature, much like her anxieties, begins to grow at an alarming rate. The predictable tropes of missing pets and panicked neighbors soon unravel, revealing the true terror: a family on the brink of collapse.

    The film's opening scene leaves little doubt about the monstrous path Sting is destined for. This might leave some viewers wanting more mystery, but it allows the focus to remain on the emotional journey of the characters.

    Ultimately, "Sting" is a satisfying creature feature with a surprising amount of comedy. While predictable in its plot beats, it delivers effective scares and a touching family drama.
  • lord_orsum3 May 2024
    Warning: Spoilers
    Don't get me wrong, I had fun watching this film. But it is so "by the numbers" that it almost defies belief.

    So...apartment block in winter, during blizzard, alien spider which grows at an impossible rate. Cue various gory deaths (but only of characters that deserve it) and a battle for survival using wits and whatever comes to hand. But the monster has a vital weakness which can be exploited.

    In many ways, I felt like I was watching a 1950s B-movie. The plot was so generic, so predictable, so cliched, that it was like an old pair of comfortable slippers. And that is not always a bad thing.
  • WooderIce6411 April 2024
    Sting is a good, not great kind of movie. It's not bad, it's not spectacular. Sure, it has a lot of cliches and it's fairly predictable, but it makes up for it with some cool aspects. First off, the spider looks and sounds pretty good. As a creature feature, it works fairly well. A lot of it is set in the vents and air ducts of a Brooklyn brownstone, which is interesting but unfortunately underutilized. The claustrophobic setting generally does work pretty well. The kills are brutal, and it very much leans into the body horror subgenre (which is what disturbs me personally, so it was effective in that regard). Think back to middle school science class and imagine what you know spiders do to their prey, and now imagine that happening to people. That's what goes on in it. The effects are quite good. The characters are bland, tropey, and forgettable. But then again, are you seeing this movie for the characters or for the killer spider? There's a great tension-building atmosphere, and there are some pretty cool shots from the spider's perspective. The dialogue isn't the best, and every attempt at humor falls flat. It's a fine movie, nothing too special, but if you're the type of horror fan who's in it for those brutal kills, it has those.
  • I watched the new Australian film 🇦🇺 Sting (2024) in theaters last night. The story revolves around an alien comet crashing to Earth and landing in a nondescript house in New York City during a snowstorm, unleashing a spider that threatens the family and everyone around them.

    This picture is written and directed by Kiah Roache-Turner (Wyrmwood 1 & 2) and stars Alyla Browne (True Spirit), Tony Black, Jermaine Fowler (Sorry to Bother You), Silvia Colloca (Van Helsing) and Ryan Corr (Wolf Creek 2).

    The movie exceeded my expectations. The special effects are top-notch, featuring impressive CGI, realistic corpses, and blood splatter. The film delivers plenty of creepy scenes along with a well-balanced infusion of comedy. Helga and Frank stand out as fantastic supporting characters, providing consistent laughs throughout. While some of the kills could have been more creative, once the action ramps up inside the house with the spider, it becomes a thrilling and enjoyable ride.

    In conclusion, Sting is a fun addition to the horror genre, reminiscent of films like 8 Legged Freaks. I'd give it a solid 6.5-7/10 and strongly recommend it.
  • This is a horror movie for sure, if you like horror movies I recommend this one. As the title says, I went into it without knowing very much and that was a good thing. I won't ruin that here. You know it's about a spider and a little girl, that much is from the cover. Is that spider good or bad, is the girl bad, are they friends, these are the things I had no idea about and kept it that way until I had a chance to see it in the theater. I would say this could probably wait for a streaming viewing or DVD/Blu-ray if that's still a thing. The special effects are good, but it's not the type of movie that warrants a larger screen than most people have in their homes these days. If you like horror, give this one a go and try not to read too much on it so you can be surprised as well. If not, it's still good and worth a watch. There is blood, there is some gore and it's a great time.
  • I like spiders. They freak me out and scare me, and we have some particularly fast obnoxious ones where I live, which will crawl over you at night, but I somehow still like them. They're interesting to watch. And they make great horror film monsters.

    Along comes Sting, an underwhelming spider horror film. An alien spider is taken in by the daughter and quickly grows and develops an apetite for other animals and eventually humans.

    The film starts like a horror comedy with overacting and wild POV camera angles, only to then get serious again with family drama and then after about 45 minutes go back into horror comedy. While tonal inconsitencies can work if they represent the state of a character's mind (i.e. Clockwork Orange), they don't work in a silly horror film with a paper thin plot. The movie never knows what kind of film it wants to be, and thus undermines both the scares and the jokes. The creature and gore effects are fine. Nothing you haven't seen before. The color grading is decent, while the camera work obnoxiously draws attention to itself.

    Sting lacks bite.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I think it's a good watch, definitely a hidden gem like some are saying on here .

    The plot was great -the story telling here was different and I enjoyed that. I like how it wasn't a syfy rip off using some old story,it's new and fresh. A meteor is different and I thought that itself was a cool idea to introduce the threat here .

    I loved the one graphic kill that we did get...I love horror moves with gore. So when I seen that it traumatized me but it also made me enjoy & get more invested in the movie . Wish we got more like that but that one was good enough for now. Hopefully there is a sequel so we can get something bigger, better.
  • I saw this movie had a good score, particularly for a horror. I thought the opening scenes were alright. The movie's visual style kinda reminded me of "Willard"

    But the movie fails to execute. Instead of a creepy or thrilling horror about monstrous spiders - we go on and on with the family drama. We get scenes with a dementia-striken mother, arguments between a stepfather and stepdaughter, arguments between a husband and wife, and discussions about the family's income (mostly tied to the patriarch's odd line of work as a comic-book illustrator). They should've scrapped these scenes and went more with the spiders.
  • Greetings again from the darkness. The trailer for this one makes it clear that it's a monster movie in the vein of those Friday late night creature-features I stayed up watching as a kid ... whenever I wasn't grounded from watching TV. Australian filmmaker Kiah Roche-Turner has set this one in Brooklyn and it takes place almost entirely inside an old apartment building (the only exceptions are shots of the ice storm occurring outside).

    Roche-Turner may have delivered the latest creature-feature, however, it's not one of those that inspires empathy towards the creature. Twelve-year-old Charlotte (get it??) is on one of her adventures through the air vents of the old building when she captures a little black spider. A pet spider may be uncommon, but keeping secrets from your mother, Heather, (Penelope Mitchell, HELLBOY, 2009) and stepdad, Ethan, (Ryan Corr, THE WATER DIVINER, 2014) is right in line with the actions of an adolescent frustrated by the responsibilities of having to watch her newborn brother while the frazzled adults go about earning a living.

    The film's opening shows Charlotte's sweater-knitting grandmother, Helga (Noni Hazelhurst, TRUTH, 2015), battling dementia and calling the exterminator after hearing loud noises in the wall. The story then flashes back four days to when Charlotte first finds the spider. Frank (Jermaine Fowler, RICKY STANICKY, 2024) sprays the building, but even as a pest expert, he doesn't suspect what's about to happen. Relative newcomer Alyla Brown (TRUE SPIRIT, 2023) performs superbly as Charlotte, and is stunned when the pet spider she names Sting mimics her whistle when it's due for another meal of crunchy bugs, which leads to exponential growth.

    Although it's not necessary, there are additional elements to the story that occur around the whole rapidly-growing spider. Charlotte's stepdad is the building super and an aspiring comic book artist. In an effort to bond with her, Ethan illustrated the story she created about her biological father, whose deadbeat nature mother Heather has withheld from her. Their neighbors consist of lonely widow Maria (Siliva Colloca, VAN HELSING, 2004) and oddball science geek Erik (Danny Kim, "Born to Spy"), the latter of whom exposes Charlotte's clandestine arachnid pet to the parents. The final player here is frugal and grumpy Gunther (Robyn Nevin, RELIC, 2020), who apparently owns the building and lives with her sister Helga. Ms. Nevin has a face made for horror films (and I mean that as a compliment) and gets to go full out in her one big scene with Ethan.

    As you'd expect, some of these folks meet a grisly end, while others are more fortunate. There are enough kills for those that lust for such moments, and enough creepiness and chuckles for everyone else. It does take a while for the arachnid rampage to begin, but there's enough suspense to keep us around. Most will appreciate Brad Shield's cinematography as the camera worms it's way through the claustrophobic hallways and air ducts of the building. The origins of the spider might be missed by those who aren't paying close attention, but it's a brilliant touch. And even though it's a bit of campy horror, the dayglo red used in the fake blood is among the worst you'll likely ever see. The film is quite a bit different from the 1990 cult classic ARACHNOPHOBIA, but the lesson in keeping moth balls on hand could someday come in handy. Over the opening credits, "What a Way to Die" by The Pleasure Seekers acts as a foreshadowing of events, and in keeping with the film's title, there are a couple of "stingers" for those who stick around.

    Opening in theaters on April 12, 2024.
  • I had a few issues with 'Sting', but one of the biggest ones was that it never settled on a tone. After the first scene I thought to myself, okay they're going full blown horror/comedy - I don't love that but if it commits to it it could work. But then the film started taking itself very seriously for a while. Then it would jump back into light-hearted funny mode again. And this continued throughout the runtime of the film. I never felt like I knew what it was going for and I don't think the film itself did either.

    My other main gripe comes in the form of a spoiler, so I can't go into it in too much detail. All I can say is I didn't particularly like how the ending of the film was handled. Had it gone a different, more daring route I feel like a lot of the past indiscretions could have been more easily forgiven.

    The film has its good points too. There was a child actor who got a lot of screen time and I didn't find overly annoying. The CGI also looks really good for the most part. It's almost impossible to make an over-sized spider look in any way realistic, but it certainly looked a lot better than they did back in the 'Eight Legged Freaks' days. It is quite a dark film too which probably helps to cover any imperfections up a little.

    This film is harmless fun for the most part. But it's less daring than I would've liked it to be and it would've done well to settle on a particular genre blend and commit to that. 5/10.
  • rjhamm-5023413 April 2024
    Hidden gem I suppose, considering we were the only ones in the theater on opening night.

    It's a good watch.

    As someone with arachniphobia, I've never been truly terrified watching other spider monster movies.

    This movie made me jump, frequently.

    The characters are well written, characters you want to root for.

    If they happen to write a sequel, yeah I'd buy tickets to watch it and I don't really like theaters.

    Give it a try, no good reason we were the only viewers in the theater.

    Unsure why this movie wasn't marketed more. Perhaps they want to be considered a hidden gem?

    Good job crew. :)
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I saw "Sting" in a mostly empty theatre; at first, it was just me, sitting towards the front, and a random man who decided to sit in the very back row. And then, as the movie was beginning to start, something unconscionable happened: a mother and her young daughter - no older than ten years old - walked in and sat in the same row I was sitting in. I was annoyed, yes, that out of every other empty seat those two decided to sit next to me, but I was also worried - could that young girl handle this supposedly gory and rated R horror film? As the lights dimmed and the film began, I braced myself for this mother and daughter duo to hurriedly exit the theatre at the first sight of blood. So I sat, started to watch, and before I knew it, something curious happened; "Sting," advertised as a violent slasher, surprisingly evolves into a sort of coming-of-age narrative, focusing on a young girl's journey to understand herself and her place in the world amidst the complexities of the people around her. And I realized that, maybe at the end of the day, this was the perfect film for a mother and her daughter to bond over.

    Alyla Browne plays Charlotte, a young girl who, upon stumbling on a small spider, decides to keep it as a pet before discovering that, the more she feeds the little guy, the bigger it grows. And, in typical horror movie fashion, the bigger the spider grows, the hungrier it gets, and the more it wants to eat. And, as the star of the show, Alyla - armed with a water gun full of mothball water - will stop at nothing to hunt the spider down, save her family, and end its rain of terror. And amidst this chaotic ordeal, she also grapples with her relationship with her mother's new boyfriend, all while her biological father remains absent. Juggling familial drama and a battle against a giant spider, Alyla's character faces double the struggle... and now can you see why I said that this film turns into a coming-of-age tale?

    "Sting" is not what you're expecting; heck, it certainly wasn't what I was expecting based on the brilliant first trailer that sold an eerie, stark horror setting akin to "Evil Dead Rise." Walking into the theatre I thought for sure that I'd be treated to a gross, gory film that would really let its premise run wild. And while there is a disturbing kill in the middle of the film that almost satisfied my increasing appetite for horror violence, after watching the film to its completion, I am almost getting the feeling that the shots of violence were afterthoughts because, as a whole, "Sting" is less a horror film and more of a children's thriller. And with that said, if you can brush off any initial disappointment that you might be feeling from that, there is some charm to be found here if you're willing to look for it.

    Besides the occasional bloody image, and the aforementioned death scene, "Sting" is a tame and campy little tale that mostly focuses on Charlotte's familial drama, wrapped around this back drop of an ever-growing spider. Typically, this bait and switch would have annoyed me (and in ways, it kind of did, as I was really looking forward to an explicit, violent slasher), but where "Sting" succeeds is in its performances, specifically that of Alyla Browne. I can't recall if I've seen her act in anything before, but based on her performance here I hope that she works for years to come because, man, she was unbelievably good here. Where other child actors would over act, or overreact, Alyla always acted with pinpoint precision, never becoming unbelievable or embarrassing to watch as most child actors are. She was so good, in fact, that I started to become invested in the drama, more so than the horror. I enjoyed watching the bond between Charlotte and her mother's boyfriend, and when the relationship started to struggle, I wanted to see them mend their wounds and become a true family - and that's not something I expected to feel walking into a cheesy creature feature. However, if you find yourself walking into this cheesy creature feature, too, will you get what you're looking for? If you're purely looking for spider on human violence, unfortunately, you'll leave disappointed.

    As much as I enjoyed watching Alyla's performance, I was still disappointed by the lack of blood and gore; I know that might make me seem a little bloodthirsty, but, I mean, in a movie about a giant spider terrorizing people in an apartment complex, can you blame me for wanting a little bit more action? Most of the spider's kills were offscreen teases instead of onscreen blood baths, with the singular and most disturbing kill taking place (I believe) midway through the film. It's a long wait to get to it, and afterward you're never treated to anything similar unless you count one burst of blood that could easily be fit into a PG-13 movie. And due to this lack of violence and focus on Charlotte, it truly feels like "Sting" was originally going to be more of a kid's film before, and for some reason, being turned into an R-rated horror flick. I'm not sure if this is the case, but it wouldn't surprise me if it was.

    At the end of the day, "Sting" isn't the slasher it advertises itself as, and honestly, it is barely a horror film. Due to the dismal audience reviews, I can see that many were led astray by the film's marketing - as was I. However, the performance of Alyla Browne managed to draw me into the plot that the film was presenting; additionally, the movie does look really good, and the spider is appropriately creepy if you are phobic, as I am. And so, "Sting" is just an average little thriller that's fun enough for a late night watch, only elevated by the strength of its actors. If it really leaned in on its premise and became a full blown slasher then I could see it becoming a cult classic. As it stands the way it is, though, I can see it becoming an introductory horror film for curious young viewers, as it may have been for the mother and her daughter who walked in during my screening.
  • I watched Sting early as part of AMC's Screen Unseen. I knew absolutely nothing about the movie. But I'm someone who loves creature features and watches most theatrically-released horror flicks. I also love spiders. Spider-man is my favorite superhero. I've seen nearly every (mostly terrible) spider-related movie (Eight Legged Freaks, Arachnophobia, Big Ass Spider!, etc). The spider gremlin is the coolest one of the Gremlins series.

    The reason I say all this is to illustrate that it should've been easy for me to like this. Even if it wasn't "good," I would have been fine with something entertaining and fun. But every aspect of this movie is underwhelming.

    This includes the cast, the performances and the characters (aside from the daughter). The dialogue is weak. The comedy isn't funny enough. The scares aren't scary enough. It's more boring than fun.

    But the worst is the lack of spider. I estimate 30 seconds of total screen time. I'm not exaggerating. And I understand the concept of keeping the creature hidden to add suspense. But 30 seconds just isn't enough. And I'm confident this has to do with budgetary limitations. But that excuse won't stop creature feature fans from feeling entirely unsatisfied.

    (1 viewing, early screening Screen Unseen 3/25/2024)
  • It's like someone made Little Shop of Horrors meets Aliens or rather that's what it reminds me of. I was expecting a very low grade horror movies and in a lot of ways that's exactly what it is, but the filmmakers did such a good job of putting it together that it just made for one of the best I've seen this year.

    The monster itself was excellent. Just scary as hell and monstrous to boot. I feel like it was all about what needed to be show and what particular time and what did not and they did it with perfection.

    Not much to say but to say it's definitely worth your time to see sting. Was not expecting much but got so much.
  • mihaistaninxs23 April 2024
    The fourth long movie from the director of the zombie apocalypse: "Wyrmwood"!

    "Sting" is a decent little horror flick about a spider from outer space who is "in the care" of a little 12 years old girl named: Charlotte!

    She named the spider: Sting (obviously) and soon she realized the little thing starts to grow in size and to do bad things.

    The acting is decent, some cool special effects with some good camera work.

    Pretty gross scenes and some blood and gore.

    The ones who are afraid of spiders will enjoy this bcz yeah: thats the point of this movie with a spider: to be scary and gross for the ones who hate these arachnoids. Go and see the movie, go and defeat your fear of spiders and enjoy this little horror! It's pretty decent!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    An unsatisfying kiddo spider "giant" movie in a very strange unsafe apartment building where nearly nobody lives besides an alien spider from space that lays eggs all by itself.

    The problem with the movie is that it's more thrilling comical than pure horror thriller and besides the poor scientist and the brave little girl, we have just frowny funny characters in unrealistically tense situations.

    The movie is lame, should have been made as a real R, in a bigger apartment complex with mutant spiders that make their victims morph and transform in turn to spiders with horrifying special effects.

    "Vermines" (aka Infested) wasn't good, but it packed at least a big "restricted" punch.

    • Screenplay/storyline/plots: 4
    • Production value/impact: 3
    • Development: 5.5
    • Realism: 4.5
    • Entertainment: 4.5
    • Acting: 5.5
    • Filming/photography/cinematography: 5.5
    • VFX: 8
    • Music/score/sound: 5.5
    • Depth: 3
    • Logic: 1.5
    • Flow: 4
    • Horror/sci-fi/thriller/drama: 4
    • Ending: 2.5.
  • I'll be honest, I was not excited about this at all. Properly meh... n I'll watch if I've nothing else on my radar.

    Maybe that helped?

    Combined with my huge fear of spiders... and recent releases of similar genre and theme.

    I got the chance to watch, and I have to be honest it was a good fun watch. Not what I expected at all.

    It had good comedy moments (loved grandma) and the dog scene. Not a spoiler.

    There was elements that reminded me of home alone, if you watch you'll know.

    I think this film was really well done, like I say someone with a feat but I didn't find it boring at any part and enjoyed the actual story. Definitely say give it a look. Took me by surprise.
  • The movie's not great, I wasn't surprised I'd never heard of it once it started. The asteroid scene was so bad, looked like graphics from the 90's or an old video game. I was literally in shock I wanted to laugh. The goo made it feel like you were about to watch ghostbusters, but maybe that's because I just watched that recently. Didn't feel scary at all, and didn't do great at building up tension or suspense throughout the movie. Exterminator was acting like he's the Terminator when he wasn't being funny. The movie isn't mad hilarious, the laughs aren't that memorable; but it was funnier than it was scary. It almost felt like a bad parody at times. I think there's a credit scene, I heard it start playing but I was already halfway out the theatre and the movie wasn't good enough to warrant me turning back. But some people went back, so I'm assuming they enjoyed the movie. I didn't hate it enough to regret going to see it, but it's not a movie I'd recommend.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I saw Sting, starring Alyla Browne-The Secret Kingdom, Three Thousand Years of Longing; Ryan Corr-The Secrets She Keeps_tv, Hacksaw Ridge; Penelope Mitchell-Hellboy_2019, The Vampire Diaries_tv and Jermaine Fowler-Coming 2 America, The Eric Andre Show_tv.

    This is an Australian horror movie and not an autobiography of the lead singer of the Police-I'm sorry, I couldn't resist. A small meteor crashes into an apartment building, releasing a small spider-maybe it was a space ship? Alyla finds the spider and turns it into a pet named Sting-named after a sword from her favorite book, The Hobbit. I know, it's a little weird for a pet but she has had a rough time lately. Her father abandoned the family and Ryan is Alyla's new step dad that is married to her mother, Penelope. Ryan is a comic book artist and works as the building maintenance man in his spare time. Alyla discovers that whenever she feeds Sting, he grows at an astonishing rate-it doubles it's size in hours. Of course, when it gets too big, it goes in search of more food, such as pets and then eventually, people. Jermaine is the exterminator they call for assistance. The arachnid also has some other little talents, such as imitating vocal sounds-which comes in handy while it's searching for food. There are 2 scenes as the end credits start but nothing at the very end.

    It's rated R for violence, bloody images and language and has a running time of 1 hour & 31 minutes.

    I enjoyed it and would buy it on DVD.
  • I saw "Infested" and while the acting was great, the story and execution left a lot to be desired. No gory death scenes, no graphic violence at all, and the worst offender; "black blood" (where they hide the blood in dark scenes or make it look like black ink to not offend the more sensitive and fragile viewers). I thought the movie was severely hindered by keeping things tame and relatively issue free for teh sake for a wider audience, but a movie about killer spiders, one of the most vicious arachnids out there, needs to be over the top with violence and graphic gore. While this movie also fails at this department, it made up for it by being enjoyable throughout and having some good dynamics between the characters. It was definitely another missed opportunity, and I don't understand why such movies are being limited in their scope. It's truly baffling how you will release a film that will probably be forgotten in a few weeks instead of going all out and giving people something they will remember. I want someone to do for spiders that Terrifier 2 did for Clowns.

    A spider is a creature with the strength of several times its body weight, can create powerful webs and liquefy the internal organs of its prey before consuming it. Why is it so hard to show a spider doing this in a serious film, to a human or other animal? In this movie it's an extraterrestrial spider, but nothing about it conveyed this. No extra leg, no glowing butt. So much could have been doing with an alien spider, that I fail to truly comprehend how the creative team just settled on "It gets bigger as it eats". How creatively bankrupt! I would have made the spider capable of turning other creatures into eight legged freaks, a cat, dog, even the baby would have gotten the treatment. Now THAT would have been a movie. Instead we got the most basic horror/comedy you could possibly muster with such a premise, and really, that's why this film fails for me (even though I enjoyed it for the most part).

    The tone of film was all over the place, the actual spiders weren't featured nearly as much as I though and the little girl would have been better if it were a boy, but aside from that, this movie really doesn't have much going for it. It's enjoyable sure, but a lot of things are fun and then you never think of them ever again. That is this film.

    A fun ride with a lot of issues that you probably won't remember a single detail about in a years time. Truly wasted potential.
  • Sting is a new horror film created and written by Kiah Roache-Turner, the director of the Wyrmwood films 12-year-old Charlotte (Alyla Browne) finds a special spider and secretly eats it. During this education she learns that the spider is very intelligent, but is also becoming increasingly hungry and small insects are soon no longer enough for the spider.

    As the spider begins to develop a taste for other animals and even humans, Charlotte learns that the spider is too dangerous to maintain. She has to stop the spider before it tries to eat too many people and animals.

    After his more indie zombie and demon movie, Kiah Roache-Turner is now trying to make a monster movie about a scary induced spider, which is starting to become more and more dangerous. Before the spider really threatens to pose a major threat, he makes the film more about a family drama. Here, Charlotte must learn to cope with a stepfather and a new baby, while beginning to feel less important. That is why she starts a "friendship" with this intelligent spider, but in the beginning there are so few interesting events in the film to keep you as a viewer interned in the film. Later, when the spider starts to get bigger, a little more happens, but not enough, to really make the movie better.

    The film is also somewhat reminiscent of a simple copy of the 1979 film Alien, but with a less original story and interesting characters. Furthermore, this film is also somewhat reminiscent of the monster film Eight Legged Freaks, a more horror-comedy about an invasion of large spiders. This was more of a horror comedy filled with cheesy humor, which is often found in more parody comedy films. With Sting she seems to try to keep it more like a real horror film with scary or bloody horror moments. Yet there are moments and characters in the film that seem to come more from a parody horror comedy. This can make the film seem unbalanced.

    Compared to Eight Legged Freaks, the spider in this film comes across well, because it is often more in the shadows, so that the CGI with which it is placed in the film is not so noticeable. When the spider has a large size, it appears less programming and the CGI is more noticeable.

    Alyla Browne gives a nice performance as a girl who increasingly begins to feel lonely after changes in her family life. Her character is just not that interesting in the film, she often wants to follow things on her phone or share them on social media. It seems that after the spider starts to become more bloodthirsty, they can no longer really take responsibility for the spider's actions. The other characters are also not very well developed or interesting to follow.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Living in a cramped apartment, a teenager and her broken family trying to blend together with their new relationships find themselves under attack by what was initially thought to be a pet spider only to discover it's actually a ravenous alien being and must try to stop it before it takes over.

    Overall, this was a decidedly decent if somewhat underwhelming creature feature. Among the positives here is the genuinely chilling atmosphere of the setup as the location allows this one to play nicely with the imagery of the concurrent phobia surrounding the situation. Knowing full well the idea of the massive, mutated spider is a creepy one, this one takes on the rampaging spider in the darkened hallways and ducts of an apartment complex trapped in with a raging snowstorm, this one creates a nice bit of fun in the last act when it goes for some rather solid confrontations with the creature. As there's plenty of fantastic stalking scenes offering the massive creature stalking residents throughout the complex emerging out of the shadows to spin massive deadly webbing, inject them with deadly venom, or other debilitating antics that provide plenty of fun and chills. With the practical effects-driven sequences letting this have some great kills due to this section of the film, it makes for a lot to like and lifts this up the most. That said, this one is somewhat flawed and problematic. One of the main issues here is the immensely underwhelming first half where the entire first half here is spent on nothing interesting with all the focus on their strained family dynamic. The issues at play here with the daughter trying to bond with the new stepfather and failing, the husband and wife trying to raise a mixed family in a cramped, falling-apart apartment, and the bizarre cast of characters living in the building with them creates a wholly effective starting point but just goes on way too long to the point the storylines border on cliche. The well-meaning stepfather who can't do anything right, the moody teenager who does things to endanger others but doesn't care because her attraction outweighs common sense, and kooky dialog for the sake of kooky dialogue keep this so sluggish and bland it's hard to stay invested here. Given that the spider hardly ever appears and doesn't do much of anything until the final half makes this stand out even more, and the whole effect manages to stand out enough here to hold this down.

    Rated R: Graphic Violence, Graphic Language, infants in danger, and violence-against-animals.
  • I really liked this one; almost a lot; it's got a good creepy vibe all wrapped up in a stuffy atmosphere made up of isolation, difficult living circumstances, overbearing & stingy landlord, a creature with a growing appetite doubled with a scary cunning, and a gentle pinch of barely there humoristic touch.

    It's well played and despite lacking characters to really root for -and that feels intended- they all but one or two got some depth and surely one can't help but feel for all of them...apart maybe for one truly weirder tenant.

    Kid can play and the after credits don't disappoint.

    Feel I could watch this again some day, before a sequel it that'd be on the cards.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I copied the below review because it's exactly how I felt about his movie. It's weird, and not in the good kind of so weird it's good type of way. With the weirdest building layout ever, it's doctor who type of boiler room and air ducts that rival those on the Nostromo. This is not a good film.

    The movie fails to execute. Instead of a creepy or thrilling horror about monstrous spiders - we go on and on with the family drama. We get scenes with a dementia-stricken mother, arguments between a stepfather and stepdaughter, arguments between a husband and wife, and discussions about the family's income (mostly tied to the patriarch's odd line of work as a comic-book illustrator). They should've scrapped these scenes and went more with the spiders.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    For arachnophobics, watching this will heighten your fears, give you sleepless nights, and maybe even require therapy afterward.

    The story is simple. An alien creature crash lands into an apartment. What initially appears to be a spider turns out to be much more. As Charlotte befriends and feeds it, it grows rapidly due to its alien DNA. She believes she can make it her pet, naming it Sting, but it may prove to be more than she can handle.

    When residents and pets are killed by Sting, the real horror begins. There is also a subplot involving family drama and strained relationships.

    Surprisingly, the film is highly entertaining and far exceeded my expectations. The acting is decent, and the relationships between the characters are very believable. Well done.
An error has occured. Please try again.