User Reviews (96)

Add a Review

  • Darren Lynn Bousman has had some rough years as a director, yet his previous works, in my opinion, stand higher than this one.

    "St. Agatha", as a horror, offers nothing new, original, amazing, extraordinary or even good. The writers responsible for the story and characters definitely do not deserve nor applause nor a subtle nod, maybe a little shaming. The story's fairly straight-forward, never builds up to anything unexpected, the suggested supernatural angle of the plot is not explored or explained much at all. The protagonist characters are traditionally dumb, the antagonist characters are sort of over-written, even annoying at some points. However, the acting did not bother me, given the variety of weakly written characters, the level of acting in "St. Agatha" is rather impressive.

    Cinematography is decent, noticeably low-budget, but good enough to not annoy the eye of the viewer. There are a few decent, scattered scenes of violence & abuse - the short, more action-ey parts of the movie are at least average. All is accompanied by a soundtrack that's mostly noticeable only when the ominous, creepy choir voices join in. The pacing is pretty draggy, there's more lows than highs. If you don't have a strong principle of finishing whatever You've started watching, as I do, prepare for the risk of poor Agatha putting You to sleep.

    "St. Agatha" is a painfully average, if not below, indie horror flick. Disappointing. My rating: 4/10.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    In 1957, the teenager Mary (Sabrina Kern) feels guilty for the accidental death of her young brother drowned in a bathtub. She decides to leave her alcoholic father to live with her boyfriend Jimmy (Justin Miles). They become con artists, but one day one of their victims discovers the scheme and take all their money. Pregnant and left without any means of survival, Mary decides to leave Jimmy, who is a musician, and move to an isolated convent to deliver the baby. She is welcomed by the Mother Superior (Carolyn Hennesy), but soon Mary learns that there is a scheme in the convent to take the babies from the pregnant women.

    "St. Agatha" is a film labeled with the horror genre, but there is basically cruelty and not horror. However, it is not a bad movie, but the viewer needs to have the stomach for watching the cruelties that Mary is submitted in the convent by the nuns. My vote is six.

    Title (Brazil): Not Available
  • Had read very bad reviews bah it n even the ratings weren't convincing but I had hope in Bousman. The plot - A pregnant con woman seeks asylum in an isolated convent run by a bunch of outcast nuns. The woman's backstory is told through flashbacks. It doesn't take much longer to reveal to us that the nuns r short of cash, their donors r limited, they r very extreme in their torture methods but somehow they do have a doctor always ready. The set up is 50's n therefore one shouldn't question the plausibility. But what really bugs me is the rushed up ending. Although ther is decent tension maintained n the ominous music helps but the suspense is zero n the ending meh. Carolyn Hennesy as Mother Superior is top notch.
  • nogodnomasters19 February 2019
    Warning: Spoilers
    October 1957, Georgia. Mary (Sabrina Kern ) is a young girl who becomes pregnant. Her boyfriend cannot support her, so she goes to St. Agatha, a local convent that specializes in helping pregnant teens. They are no longer connected to the church because of their "methods." A sign that says. "Get Out" in my book.

    As you can guess, this is an adoption agency for money and the methods are extremely cruel, but there is nothing supernatural in the feature. Mary's story is told in dream flashbacks.

    A rather average film, Mediocre script. The dialogue was lacking.

    Guide: No swearing. Brief sex. Brief Nudity (Sabrina Kern)
  • Giving it 3 stars only because the acting was okay.... But the script and directing of it was absolutely horrendous. It's one thing to give your screen characters the IQ's of a potato, but it's unforgivable to treat your audience as morons. Add to that a slow pacing only made even slower by numerous flashbacks. It might have been saved by at least a good finale confrontation between the main protagonist and antagonist, but even that was omitted. Instead we were given a ridiculous ,unrealistic and almost laughable act at the end.
  • I wish I could say there was a twist or something super exciting and unpredictable that happens but there just isn't.
  • I ended up watching this movie thinking its some sort of nun horror which it is not. Nonetheless there is quite a bit of brain put here to keep it taut and interesting. Alas when you get a bit involved in whats happening the makers went clueless how to end it and just brought up a half hearted ending which seems rushed and out of place. Wish they had kept the flow and come up with a flow that justified the ending. Would have deserved a star or two more had the ending been cohesive.
  • BA_Harrison8 October 2022
    I've got mixed feelings about Darren Lynn Bousman as a director: I enjoyed the heck out of Mother's Day (2010) and Repo! The Genetic Opera (2008), and I liked his segment for Tales of Halloween (2015), but his Saw films are some of the weaker entries in the franchise, and I absolutely hated The Devil's Carnival (2012) and Alleluia! The Devil's Carnival (2016).

    Initially, St. Agatha looks set to be another high point on his resumé, with an eerie set-up, solid performances, and some noteworthy scenes of nastiness (including a woman forced to eat her own vomit and another made to cut out her own tongue); however, the film takes a serious nosedive as it nears the final act with preposterous plot developments that simply don't ring true.

    The film takes place in 1950s Georgia: Mary becomes pregnant out of wedlock and, with her boyfriend Jimmy (Justin Miles), a musician about to go on tour, she takes herself to the Sisters of Divinity Convent, which cares for 'fallen' women; however, it soon becomes obvious that there is something very strange going on at the convent, the doors and windows securely locked at night, the other women afraid to talk. Over time, Mary realises that the mother superior (Carolyn Hennesy, giving a truly chilling performance) is a total psycho, ruling the convent with fear and violence, aided by nuns almost as demented as she is.

    When Mary revolts, she is locked in a coffin, force-fed (like a baby bird - yuck!) and repeatedly told that she is no longer Mary, but Agatha. When Mary finally acquiesces, 'Agatha' is released, and is told to send Jimmy packing when he pays her a visit (one of the nuns has a gun trained on the man, in case Mary/Agatha doesn't do as she is instructed). However, Mary's will isn't really broken - she's just waiting for the right time to make her escape.

    And this is where the film starts to fall down with some spectacularly bad writing...

    After discovering the dead body of Jimmy in the convent, Mary is permitted to call the police, the mother superior content that no-one will believe her. Rather than explain to the policeman what has happened in a calm and rational manner, Mary rants incoherently, thereby affirming the mother superior's story about the young woman's delusional state. The cop dismisses Mary's claims that Jimmy is dead, even though it wouldn't be too hard to check if he has disappeared. Cops sure are dumb in horror films.

    But it gets worse. In an admittedly suspenseful scene, Mary sneaks out of her room and steals all of the convent's money (made by selling the women's babies to rich donors); she then proceeds to pay the mother superior's hitherto loyal nun assistants, and the dodgy doctor who delivers the babies, to betray their leader - an extremely risky move on Mary's part given how duplicitous they have been in the past. Luckily, all of them happily take the cash and stay true to their word, locking the mother superior in the coffin. Having dealt with their boss, they all partake in a refreshing glass of water and drop down dead, the drinks laced with rat poison. All of this stretched plausibility too far for me, a shame given how it was going so well for much of the running time.
  • Certainly nothing to write home about, but it did keep me intrigued. It's slow moving, and works up to a pretty gruesome ending. No surprise twists, and the acting is ok with a very solid performance by Carolyn Hennessy. It kind of wants to be a spin off of AHS Asylum, but doesn't quite make it. Flawed at best, I still felt like it was worth the watch. I found myself drawn toward most of the characters, despite a weak script. Give it a shot. Your might like it!
  • PhilipGHarris19 September 2018
    Warning: Spoilers
    Before I complain, let me just say that the acting in St. Agatha is great. The players use every opportunity to try and ease a confused and messy script, but even with their best intentions at heart it really felt that this film couldn't be saved.

    Opening with the feeling of a modern Gothic horror, St. Agatha really shows some promise in the early scenes, the director seeming to have followed Tobe Hooper's classic, less can be more, principle. Unfortunately as the film develops, the subtle scenes descend into more gruesome and direct gore and you end up wishing for the implied threat. As it would certainly have given the whole film more gravitas than the shock moments which made the audience I watched it with giggle.

    When you see a horror film which has been penned by multiple writers, you're always concerned that an original vision has been overwritten with someone else's take, and this film provides that sense in droves. Some establishing ideas merely drift into the sunset to never be scene again, and there's a lack of consistency throughout.

    Sometimes we're told the women are monitored at all times, but as the number whittles down, Mary/Agatha, seems to be able to wander about freely. Some scenes are ploddingly written, such as when Mary/Agatha can phone the police, and you simply know that whoever turns up is going to be duped - especially when another policeman turns up out of the blue in a remote location. People are condemned for trying to escape, but are then given access to candles and matches and the list simply goes on. One really telling moment being the point where they're trying to break Mary and get her to conform to being Agatha, which fails to convince at all. Yet again, not the actors faults, who seem to be crying out for some clearer instruction from both director and script.

    To its credit, I stayed to the end in the hopes things would improve, and St. Agatha's is certainly not the worst horror film I have seen. But I really can't find anything apart from what has already been mentioned to compliment it.
  • I don't even now why I gave this movie 2 stars, maybe for the colors? The movie is not enjoyable horror wise - just some demented people doing crazy things. Things that could be stopped but the main characters of the movie seem to be some brainless sheep. There's some characters that were made to make you hate them and that's about it. There's no horror in this movie.
  • I'm surprised by all the negative comments about this film. I thought it was deliciously, fiendishly awesome. I'm a big horror fan and I watch a LOT of horror films (especially low budget indies) but this one really stood out for me and because of the low IMDb and user ratings I almost missed out on this wicked little gem of a film that really gets stuck in your teeth (like a dentist drilling for a root canal)

    I suppose everyone's got their own particular tastes and I've kept this review spoiler free (which is quite hard, as I want to make a clever little reference to the film) but sometimes folks you got gotta judge a movie for yourself and not follow the crowd.

    Highly recommended by reviewstalker101 (that's me btw) bon appetite.
  • OK, so this isn't going to be a film for gore fans. It is more of a psychological thriller/horror than all out horror.

    Even so, this film is well acted and produced with a solid story yo can become engrossed in.

    Certainly worth a watch.
  • This movie isnt the worst but its far from good. the acting is actually quite good but the writing kinda sucks. there's plotholes and a whole lot of suspense building to the end but then we dont get a resolution. There's also some hints at there being a supernatural element but that never gets explored. Its not so much a horror film as a thriller or suspense perhaps. I wont rewatch it but its not a bad flick to put on while you do something else.
  • rafaelfuser18 March 2019
    I can't understand why this waste of time was rated 6/10. It has to improve a lot to be a terrible movie. No sense, no story, no logical plot. A movie to forget.
  • george-robles61914 August 2019
    I didn't mind the acting at all, the actors in this movies should sue for defamation because they were all quite good. The writing was plain boring and nothing was a surprise. What a waste of time.
  • The summary gets it wrong and that sets the tone right there. Her name is Mary, and they tell her she's going to be Agatha. The women are apparently all too stupid to talk quietly, which leads to one cringeworthy scene. I can't understand if they're running a baby factory, why they aren't forcing the women to have more babies
  • I think,i understand why....its not a horror,its an intense psychological thriller. there is absolutely no horror in it,which disappoints a lot of people.But what an amazing movie if you give it a chance! there are some plot holes and the ending somewhat really unrealistic,but the tension is incredible throughout all film.Personally I liked it a lot.
  • orbitz-49-65503217 February 2019
    It's all just a bunch of words. It doesn't go anywhere. It did catch me at the beginning then lost me 2 mins in
  • Warning: Spoilers
    While this movie is most definitely lacking in some departments such as the script which definitely leaves something to be desired. However, overall the movie was pretty good! It looks like it would be a horror movie however it is definitely more a psychological thriller. The plot has some holes that don't make sense.. like Paula, is she a victim a willing participant? Cause I mean at times she seemed reluctant and guilty. They do though cover that up with a constant flow of you have to be kidding me moments! BI can definitely say for myself and my friend who watched it we were definitely cheering for a victory for poor Mary (and eventually Sarah) in the end. And we liked/hated that the ending made us go "oh I get it.... and then dammit". There are however a few good "jump scare" scenes that make you a little more on edge for a few moments, I mean that ceiling scene..... There are also some pretty grotesque scenes that make you go "nope, I'm good"! All in all a good movie I would definitely recommend if your a fan of a good thriller!
  • I'll keep it short. The plot is unoriginal. The writing is terribly dumb and dull. It is not really entertaining.

    I give 2 stars because the acting and the score were good.
  • The very definition of psychological horror. The game of cat and mouse played by Sabrina Kerns and Carolyn Hennesy is nothing short of perfection. There is not a false note between them. These actresses deliver tour de force performances supported by a fine cast, especially Justin Miles as Jimmy. With the help of haunting music and lighting, Darren Lynn Bousman turns the most banal, the most innocent of images into the things of nightmares. He has a real gift of lulling his audience into a sense of security and then pulling the rug out. Over and over.
  • kosmasp14 February 2019
    You may be fed up with movies about nuns or you may be excited for them. Now that is something for you to decide. But when it comes to the horror, this is quite decent. Also try not to compare it with the Nun itself (the Conjuring universe one that is), although I do think that both have their merits and are about on the same level for different reasons.

    Now this is more down and dirty, while the other one is more glossy. This also has quite a few cliches in it. If you can deal with them, mixed with very weak character choices (though some may call them "real", at least under the circumstances), than this movie will be entertaining and it will have you on the edge of your seat.
  • Despite all the cleverly delivered thriller antics it looks beautifully arranged bouquet of nothingness that gives no satisfaction to its audience.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The acting of the protagonist left much to be desired. Unfortunately, this meant that a lot of the horror scenes weren't successful in being frightening or convincing. The plot was a little bit disjointed and tedious, so I was getting a bit bored at some points. The worst part was where, at the end, the protagonist strangles a nun to death with her own umbilical cord, which is such a laughable and totally unconvincing situation that I genuinely giggled and shook my head in disbelief! It's a just about bearable film, it's up to you if you choose to watch it, but I for one won't be watching it again.
An error has occured. Please try again.